Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-04-02 · Federal Communications Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Final rule; announcement of effective date

488 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/04/02/02-7998·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Communications Commission
Action: Final rule; announcement of effective date
Citation: FR Doc. 02-7998 · CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-77, 98-166, and 00-256; FCC 01-304 · 47 CFR 54, 69

Summary

This document announces the effective date of certain sections of the Commission's rules for reforming the interstate access charge and universal service support system for incumbent local exchange carriers subject to rate-of-return regulation (non-price cap or rate-of-return carriers) that contained information collection requirements.

Dates

The amendments to 47 CFR 47 54.307(b), 54.307(c), 54.315(a), 54.315(f)(1) through 54.315(f)(4), 54.902(a), 54.902(b), 54.902(c), 54.903(a)(1) through 54.903(a)(4), 54.904(a), 54.904(b), and 54.904(d) published at 66 FR 59719, November 30, 2001, became effective on January 8, 2002.

Supplementary Information

On May 23, 2001, the Commission released a Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket Nos. 00-256, Fifteenth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45, and Report and Order in CC Docket No. 98-77 and 98-166 (Order). In that Order the Commission modified its rules to reform the interstate access charge and universal service support system for incumbent local exchange carriers subject to rate-of-return regulation (non-price cap or rate-of-return carriers). The Commission's actions were based on pending Commission proposals that build on interstate access charge reforms previously implemented for price cap carriers, the record developed in the above-stated proceedings, and consideration of the Multi-Association Group (MAG) plan. A summary of the Order was published in the Federal Register . See 66 FR 59719, November 30, 2001. In that summary, the Commission stated that the modified rules would become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register except for §§ 54.307(b), 54.307(c), 54.315(a), 54.315(f)(1) through 54.315(f)(4), 54.902(a), 54.902(b), 54.902(c), 54.903(a)(1) through 54.903(a)(4), 54.904(a), 54.904(b), and 54.904(d) which contain information collection requirements that have not been approved by OMB and that the Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of those sections. On December 14, 2001, OMB approved the information collections. See OMB No. 3060-0972. The rule amendments adopted by the Commission in the Order took effect 30 days after publication of the Order in the Federal Register , which was December 31, 2001. The OMB approval of the information collection requirements was announced in the Federal Register on January 8, 2002. Therefore, the effective date of the information collection requirements and the rules became effective January 8, 2002. List of Subjects 47 CFR Part 54 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telecommunications, Telephone. 47 CFR Part 69 Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telephone. Federal Communications Commission. William F. Caton, Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. 02-7998 Filed 4-1-02; 8:45 am]

Connections3 off-index
3 references not yet in our index
  • 47 CFR 47
  • 47 CFR 54
  • 47 CFR 69
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Final rule; announcement of effective date
Cite47 CFR 47
Cite47 CFR 54
Cite47 CFR 69
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.