Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-04-02 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of antidumping new shipper review

426 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/04/02/02-7851·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-507-502] Certain In-Shell Raw Pistachios From Iran: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping New Shipper Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of antidumping new shipper review. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 2, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Aliadinov at
(202)482-3362, or Donna Kinsella at
(202)482-0194, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Statutory Time Limits Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) to make a preliminary determination within 180 days after the date on which the new shipper review is initiated, and a final determination within 90 days after the date the preliminary determination is issued. However, if the case is extraordinarily complicated, section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 300 days and for the final determination to 150 days after the date the preliminary determination is issued. Background On October 2, 2001 the Department initiated a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on in-shell pistachios from Iran. *See Certain In-Shell Pistachios From Iran: Initiation of New Shipper Review* , 66 FR 51638 (October 10, 2001). This order covers raw in-shell pistachios and specifically excludes roasted in-shell pistachios. *See Certain In-Shell Pistachios From Iran; Clarification of Scope in Antidumping Duty Investigation* , 51 FR 23254 (June 26, 1986). The period of review
(POR)is July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. The preliminary results are currently due on April 1, 2002. Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review The instant review involves several complex issues that necessitate a greater amount of time in order to preliminarily complete this review, including Iran's dual exchange rate system, the classification of U.S. sales (EP vs. CEP), and the appropriate basis for normal value. Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results to 300 days, which is July 29, 2002, pursuant to 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. The final results will continue to be 90 days after the date the preliminary results are issued. This extension of the time limit is in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). Dated: March 26, 2002. Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Group III. [FR Doc. 02-7851 Filed 4-1-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of antidumping new shipper review
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.