Rules and Regulations. Final rule
538 words·~2 min read·
/register/2002/03/14/02-5951A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Part 226 [DFARS Case 2001-D007] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Preference for Local 8(a) Contractors—Base Closure or Realignment AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to clarify policy pertaining to preferences for local businesses in acquisitions that support a base closure or realignment.
The rule clarifies that both competitive and noncompetitive acquisitions under the Section 8(a) Program are permitted if an eligible 8(a) contractor is located in the vicinity of the base to be closed or realigned. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Angelena Moy, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD(AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone
(703)602-1302; facsimile
(703)602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2001-D007. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background This final rule amends DFARS 226.7103 to clarify policy pertaining to preferences for local businesses in acquisitions that support a base closure or realignment. The present policy permits award under the Section 8(a) Program if “the 8(a) contractor” is located in the vicinity of the base to be closed or realigned. This rule amends the text to permit use of 8(a) procedures if “at least one eligible 8(a) contractor” is located in the vicinity. This change clarifies the intent of the policy, which is to permit both competitive and noncompetitive 8(a) acquisitions in support of a base closure or realignment. A similar clarifying amendment is made to the text pertaining to set-asides for small business concerns. DoD published a proposed rule at 66 FR 47158 on September 11, 2001. DoD received no comments on the proposed rule. Therefore, DoD is adopting the proposed rule as a final rule without change. This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.* , because the rule merely clarifies existing policy pertaining to acquisitions made in support of a base closure or realignment. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 226 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council. Therefore, 48 CFR Part 226 is amended as follows: 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 226 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1. PART 226—OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS 2. Section 226.7103 is amended by revising paragraph
(c)to read as follows: 226.7103 Procedure.
(c)If offers can be expected from business concerns in the vicinity—
(1)Consider section 8(a) only if at least one eligible 8(a) contractor is located in the vicinity.
(2)Set aside the acquisition for small business only if at least one of the expected offers is from a small business located in the vicinity. [FR Doc. 02-5951 Filed 3-13-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Traces to 3 documents
register
U.S. Code
2 references not yet in our index
- 48 CFR 226
- 41 USC 421
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources