Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-03-14 · Department of Defense (DoD) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

445 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/03/14/02-5949

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Part 225 [DFARS Case 2002-D006] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Restriction on Acquisition of Vessel Propellers AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to clarify that the statutory restriction on acquisition of vessel propellers from foreign sources applies only to DoD contracts that use fiscal year 2000 or 2001 funds.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD(AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone
(703)602-0328; facsimile
(703)602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2002-D006. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background The restriction on acquisition of vessel propellers at DFARS 225.7020 implements Section 8064 of the DoD Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-259). Section 8064 provides that no funds appropriated in fiscal year 2000 or 2001 may be used for the procurement of vessel propellers other than those produced by a domestic source and of domestic origin. The DoD Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-117) contains no such provision. Therefore, this final rule amends DFARS 225.7020 to clarify that the restriction applies only to DoD contracts that use fiscal year 2000 or 2001 funds. This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act This rule will not have a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors, or a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD. Therefore, publication for public comment is not required. However, DoD will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should cite DFARS Case 2002-D006. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council. Therefore, 48 CFR part 225 is amended as follows: 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 225 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1. PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 2. Section 225.7020-4 is amended by revising the introductory text to read as follows: 225.7020-4 Contract clause. Use the clause at 252.225-7023, Restriction on Acquisition of Vessel Propellers, in solicitations and contracts that use fiscal year 2000 or 2001 funds for the acquisition of vessels or vessel propellers, unless— [FR Doc. 02-5949 Filed 3-13-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
4 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 225
  • Pub. L. 106-259
  • Pub. L. 107-117
  • 41 USC 421
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 225
Pub. L.Pub. L. 106-259
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107-117
Cite41 USC 421
Cites 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.