Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-01-28 · Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule: Reopening of comment period; correction

268 words·~1 min read·/register/2002/01/28/02-1284·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior
Action: Proposed rule: Reopening of comment period; correction
Citation: FR Doc. 02-1284 · RIN 1076-AD93 · 25 CFR 292

Summary

This document corrects a discrepancy in the reopening of the comment period on a proposed rule concerning gaming on trust lands acquired after October 17, 1988, published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2001.

Dates

Comments must be received on or before March 27, 2002.

Supplementary Information

On Thursday, December 27, 2001, the Bureau of Indian Affairs published a document reopening the comment period on a proposed rule, 66 FR 66847, concerning Gaming on Trust Lands Acquired After October 17, 1988. The document published on December 27 incorrectly stated in the EFFECTIVE DATE section of the preamble that the deadline for receipt of comments was February 25, 2002. In addition, the caption EFFECTIVE DATE should have read DATES . Accordingly, on page 66847, in the third column, the EFFECTIVE DATE section is corrected to read “ DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 27, 2002.”. Dated: January 8, 2002. Neal A. McCaleb, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. [FR Doc. 02-1284 Filed 1-25-02; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 25 CFR 292
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule: Reopening of comment period; correction
Cite25 CFR 292
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.