Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-01-18 · DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

507 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/01/18/02-1297

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Resolving U.S. v. IBP Inc. (D. Nebraska) Notice is hereby given that the United States, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), intends, on or before February 4, 2002, to move for entry of the Consent Decree lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska on October 12, 2001. This Consent Decree, together with the Partial Consent Decree for Interim Injunctive Relief previously entered in this case, will fully resolve the United States' Complaint filed on January 12, 2000, in the District of Nebraska, alleging violations by IBP, inc. [sic] (“IBP”) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 *et seq.* ; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 *et seq.* ; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 *et seq* .; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 *et seq* .; and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. 11001 *et seq* ., at its Dakota City Nebraska slaughterhouse facility.
Notice of the lodging of the Consent Decree was previously published in the **Federal Register** on November 15, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 221, Page 57484), triggering a thirty-day public comment period that expired on December 15, 2001. One set of comments was received during this period by facsimile transmission on December 12, 2001, from a Nebraska group called Citizens Promoting Environmental Stewardship, to which the United States will respond in connection with its motion to enter the Consent Decree.
However, as a result of the discovery of anthrax contamination at the District of Columbia mail processing center, the delivery of regular first-class mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service has been disrupted. Consequently, any additional public comments on the proposed Consent Decree that were timely sent to the Department of Justice in Washington, DC, by regular, first-class mail through the U.S. Postal Service, but not sent by additional means such as overnight or facsimile transmission, have not been received.
This notice, therefore, is intended to advise any such commenters that their comments on the Proposed Consent Decree have not been received to date. Any previously submitted comments thus should be re-submitted by January 31, 2002, addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, and sent:
(1)c/o Howard Bunch, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII, 901 N. 5th St., Kansas City, Kansas 66101 and/or
(2)by facsimile to
(202)353-0296; and/or
(3)by overnight delivery, other than through the U.S. Postal Service, to Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., 13th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. Each communication should refer on its face to *United States* v. *IBP,* DOJ Ref. #90-11-3-06517/1. Any such re-submitted comments will be evaluated and responded to prior to any final decision by the United States to move to enter the Consent Decree. Robert E. Maher, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 02-1297 Filed 1-17-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 5
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.