Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-01-14 · Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal

549 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/01/14/02-800·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal
Citation: FR Doc. 02-800 · 29 CFR 2700

Summary

This action withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking that proposed adding a new procedural rule setting forth settlement procedures for cases that come before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. The new procedures were to be instituted as a pilot program for a two-year trial period. Since the issuance of the notice of proposed rulemaking, the Commission has reelvaluated the pilot program and has determined that withdrawal of the notice is appropriate at this time.

Supplementary Information

On November 10, 1999, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking, which proposed amending its procedural rules, 29 CFR part 2700, by adding a new procedural rule setting forth settlement procedures which were intended to facilitate and promote the pre-hearing settlement of contested cases that come before the Commission (64 FR 61236-39). The Commission's procedural rules are currently silent regarding procedures to be utilized by administrative law judges (“ALJs”) to facilitate the settlement of contested cases. The procedures used in a given case to foster pre-hearing settlement of disputes have been determined informally by the individual ALJ assigned to the case. The proposed rule, 29 CFR 2700.85, was intended to provide a structured and formal system for settlement, which would be initiated by the appointing of a settlement judge on the motion of any party or on the chief administrative law judge's own initiative. In response to a request by the Department of Labor's Office of the Solicitor, the Commission extended the comment period on the proposed rule for 30 days. 64 FR 68649 (Dec. 8, 1999). The Commission subsequently received comments suggesting, in part, that the settlement procedures should be initiated with the consent of all parties. In considering those comments, the Commission further examined the percentage of cases that settled and the length of time it took to reach settlement under the current informal system. Based upon that examination, the Commission has reconsidered the utility of a formal settlement system at the present time, and shall further evaluate the best means of effectuating the consensual resolution of disputes. Withdrawal of the notice of proposed rulemaking constitutes only such action, and does not preclude the Commission from issuing another notice in the future, nor does it commit the Commission to any course of action in the future. Regulatory Impact Since this action only withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking, it is neither a proposed nor a final rule and therefore is not covered under Executive Order 12866, or the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2700 Hearing and appeal procedures, Administrative practice and procedure, Ex parte communications, Lawyers. Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking that was published by the Commission in the Federal Register on November 10, 1999 (64 FR 61236-39) is withdrawn. Dated: January 7, 2002. Theodore F. Verheggen, Chairman. [FR Doc. 02-800 Filed 1-11-02; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
3 references not yet in our index
  • 29 CFR 2700
  • 29 CFR 2700.85
  • 5 USC 601-612
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal
Cite29 CFR 2700
Cite29 CFR 2700.85
Cite5 USC 601-612
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.