Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-12-28 · U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) · Notices

Notices. Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information collection request to OMB and solicitation of public comment

455 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/12/28/01-31924·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7536-01-M NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information collection request to OMB and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a submittal to OMB for review of continued approval of information collections under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted: 1. *The title of the information collection:* NRC Form 64, “Travel Voucher (Part 1)” NRC Form 64A, “Travel Voucher (Part 2)” NRC Form 64B, “Optional Travel Voucher (Part 2)”. 2. *Current OMB approval number:* 3150-0192. 3. *How often the collection is required:* On occasion. 4. *Who is required or asked to report:* Contractors, consultants and invited NRC travelers who travel in the course of conducting business for the NRC. 5. *The number of annual respondents:* 100. 6. *The number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement or request:* 100. 7. *Abstract:* As a part of completing the travel process, the traveler must file travel reimbursement vouchers and trip reports.
The respondent universe for the above forms includes consultants and contractors and those who are invited by the NRC to travel, e.g., prospective employees. Travel expenses that are reimbursed are confined to those expenses essential to the transaction of official business for an approved trip. Submit, by February 28, 2002, comments that address the following questions: 1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical utility? 2.
Is the burden estimate accurate? 3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? 4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology? A copy of the draft supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F23, Rockville, MD 20852. OMB clearance requests are available at the NRC worldwide Web site ( *http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/PUBLIC/OMB/index.html* ).
The document will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice. Comments and questions about the information collection requirements may be directed to the NRC Clearance Officer, Brenda Jo. Shelton, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, T-6 E 6, Washington, DC, 20555-0001, by telephone at 301-415-7233, or by Internet electronic mail at *BJS1@NRC.GOV.* Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of December 2001. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton, NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 01-31924 Filed 12-27-01; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.