Rules and Regulations. Notice

Agency: U.S. International Trade Commission
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 01-30275 · Inv. No. 337-TA-450

Summary

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 15) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (ALJ) in the above-captioned investigation, denying a motion of respondents Silicon Integrated Systems Corp. and Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation for summary determination on respondents' first affirmative defense of lack of importation.

Supplementary Information

The Commission instituted this investigation on March 6, 2001. The complainants are United Microelectronics Corporation of Hsinchu City, Taiwan; UMC Group (USA) of Sunnyvale, California; and United Foundry Service, Inc. of Hopewell Junction, New York. The respondents are Silicon Integrated Systems Corp. of Hsinchu City, Taiwan; and Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation of Sunnyvale, California. 66 FR 13567 (2001). On September 13, 2001, complainants filed a motion for summary determination on respondents' first affirmative defense of lack of importation. On September 25, 2001, respondents filed a cross-motion for summary determination on lack of importation. On the same day, the Commission investigative attorney (“IA”) filed his response in support of complainants” motion. On October 5, 2001, complainants filed a memorandum in opposition to respondents' cross-motion for summary determination on lack of importation and a reply memorandum in support of complainants' motion for summary determination. On the same day, the IA filed his response in opposition to respondents' cross-motion for summary determination. On October 23, 2001, complainants filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental memorandum in support of their motion, which was granted. On October 25, 2001, respondents filed a response to complainants' motion for supplemental memorandum. On November 2, 2001, the ALJ granted complainants' motion for summary determination (Order No. 15) and denied respondents' motion for summary determination. On November 8, 2001, respondents filed petition for review of the ID. On November 16, 2001, complainants and the IA filed responses in opposition to respondents' petition. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: December 3, 2001. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 01-30275 Filed 12-5-01; 8:45 am]