Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-12-05 · Federal Communications Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

545 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/12/05/01-30036·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Communications Commission
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 01-30036 · DA 01-2753, MM Docket No. 01-325, RM-10136 · 47 CFR 73

Summary

The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Green Bay 44, L.L.C., an applicant for a construction permit for a new television station operating on channel 44 at Green Bay, Wisconsin, requesting the substitution of Channel 50 for channel 44 at Green Bay. TV channel 50 can be allotted to Green Bay, Wisconsin, with a plus offset consistent with the criteria set forth in the Commission's Public Notice, released on November 22, 1999, DA 99-2605. The coordinates for channel 50+ at Green Bay are North Latitude 44-30-48 and West Longitude 88-00-24. However, since the community Green Bay is located within 400 kilometers of the U.S.-Canadian border, concurrence by the Canadian government must be obtained for this proposal. Pursuant to the provisions outlined in the Commission's Public Notice, we will not accept competing expressions of interest in the use of television channel 50+ at Green Bay.

Dates

Comments must be filed on or before January 21, 2002, and reply comments on or before February 5, 2002.

Supplementary Information

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 01-325, adopted November 29, 2001, and released November 30, 2001. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via-e-mail . Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Television broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—TELEVISION BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336. § 73.606 [Amended] 2. Section 73.606(b), the Table of Television Allotments under Wisconsin is amended by removing TV Channel 44 and adding TV Channel 50+ at Green Bay. Federal Communications Commission. Barbara A. Kreisman, Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 01-30036 Filed 12-4-01; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
3 references not yet in our index
  • 47 CFR 73
  • 47 CFR 1.1204(b)
  • 47 CFR 1.415
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite47 CFR 73
Cite47 CFR 1.1204(b)
Cite47 CFR 1.415
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.