Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-11-30 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

434 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/11/30/01-29649

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [IN122-1b; FRL-7107-8] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Indiana's opacity rules. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management
(IDEM)submitted revised opacity rules on October 21, 1999, as a requested revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions address the provisions of Indiana's opacity rule concerning the startup and shutdown of operations, the terminology used in discussing averaging periods, time periods for temporary exemptions, alternative opacity limits, and conflicts between visible opacity readings and continuous opacity monitor data. A major new component of this rule is a provision that allows the State to incorporate source-specific startup and shutdown provisions into federal operating permits for certain utility boilers, as long as those provisions fall within a range established in the rule. All of the revisions satisfy EPA guidelines. DATES: The EPA must receive written comments by December 31, 2001. ADDRESSES: You should mail written comments to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. You may inspect copies of Indiana's submittal at: Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone:
(312)886-6524. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever “we,” “us,” or “our” are used we mean the EPA. Table of Contents I. What actions are the EPA taking today? II. Where can I find more information about this proposal and the corresponding direct final rule? I. What Actions Are the EPA Taking Today? The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Indiana's opacity rules. The revisions address the provisions of Indiana's opacity rule concerning the startup and shutdown of operations, the terminology used in discussing averaging periods, time periods for temporary exemptions, alternative opacity limits, and conflicts between visible emission readings and COM data. II. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? For additional information see the direct final rule published in the rules section of this **Federal Register** . List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: November 8, 2001. Norman Niedergang, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 01-29649 Filed 11-29-01; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.