Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-10-16 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

473 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/10/16/01-25964

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [Docket # VT-020-1223b; FRL-7077-5] Approval and Promulgation of State Plans For Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Vermont; Negative Declaration AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the sections 111(d)/129 negative declaration submitted by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
(ANR)on June 5, 2001. This negative declaration adequately certifies that there are no small municipal waste combustors (small MWCs) located within the boundaries of the State of Vermont. DATES: EPA must receive comments in writing by November 15, 2001. ADDRESSES: You should address your written comments to: Mr. Steven Rapp, Chief, Air Permits Program Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. EPA, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAP), Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023. Copies of documents relating to this proposed rule are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the following location. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the day of the visit. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Permits Program Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Suite 1100 (CAP), One Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Courcier, Office of Ecosystem Protection (CAP), EPA-New England, Region 1, Boston, Massachusetts 02203,
(617)918-1659, or by e-mail at *courcier.john@epa.gov.* While the public may forward questions to EPA via e-mail, it must submit comments on this proposed rule according to the procedures outlined above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, EPA published regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B which require states to submit control plans to control emissions of designated pollutants from designated facilities. In the event that a state does not have a particular designated facility located within its boundaries, EPA requires that a negative declaration be submitted in lieu of a control plan. The Vermont ANR submitted the negative declaration to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. In the Final Rules section of this **Federal Register** , EPA is approving the Vermont negative declaration as a direct final rule without a prior proposal. EPA is doing this because the Agency views this action as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates that it will not receive any significant, material, and adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If EPA does not receive any significant, material, and adverse comments to this action, then the approval will become final without further proceedings. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and EPA will address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not begin a second comment period. Dated: September 26, 2001. Robert W. Varney, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. [FR Doc. 01-25964 Filed 10-15-01; 8:45 am]
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 62
  • 40 CFR 60
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 62
Cite40 CFR 60
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.