Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-09-07 · DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

460 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/09/07/01-22447

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in *United States* v. *Robert Desmond,* Civ. No. 01-CV-11425-RGS (D. Mass.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on August 20, 2001. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States of America against Robert Desmond, Esq., of Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 309 (b),
(d)and (g), of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319 (b),
(d)and (g), to obtain injunctive relief and impose civil penalties against the Defendant for unlawfully discharging dredged or fill materials into waters of the United States in Taunton, Bristol County, Massachusetts, for failing to comply with the terms of a March 30, 1998 administrative order, issued in accordance with Clean Water Act section 309(a), 33 U.S.C. 1319(a), requiring the completion of a restoration plan; and for failing to comply with the terms of a June 21, 1998 “Administrative Consent Agreement and Final Order,” under Clean Water Act section 309(g), 33 U.S.C. 1319(g), which directed the Defendant to pay a penalty of $12,500 by July 31, 1998. The proposed Consent Decree requires the Defendant to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $10,000, for its several alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The Defendant is required to pay an additional penalty of $48,478.47, reflecting payments owed to the United States under the CAFO, unless the Defendant proves to the satisfaction of the United States, within 90 days of entry of the Consent Decree, that he paid $12,500 to the United States on or before July 31, 1998. Finally, the proposed Consent Decree enjoins the Defendant and his agents from discharging any pollutant into waters of the United States unless such discharge complies with the provisions of the Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations. The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty
(30)days from the date of publication of this notice. Please address comments to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Attention: Joshua M. Levin, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026-3986. Please refer to the matter of *United States* v. *Robert Desmond,* DJ Reference No. 90-5-1-1-06024. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse, Suite 2300, 1 Courthouse Way, Boston, MA 02210-3002. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed on the World Wide Web at *http//www.usdoj.gov/enrd/enrd-home.html.* Scott A. Schacter, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 01-22447 Filed 9-6-01; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.