Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-07-05 · Department of Justice · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

537 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/07/05/01-16824·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Department of Justice
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 01-16824 · AAG/A Order No. 236-2001 · 28 CFR 16

Summary

The Department of Justice is exempting a Privacy Act System of records for subsections (c)(3), and (4), (d), (e)(1), (2), and (3), (e)(4)(G) and (H), (e)(5) and (8), and (g) of the Privacy act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This system of records is maintained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and is entitled “National Automated Immigration Lookout System (NAILS), JUSTICE/INS-032.” The NAILS system facilitates INS in its inspection and investigation process. The automated system provides quick and easy retrieval of biographical or case data on persons who may be either inadmissible to the United States, or of interest to other Federal agencies. The exemptions are necessary to avoid interference with law enforcement operations. Specifically, the exemptions are necessary to prevent subjects of investigations from frustrating the investigatory or other law enforcement process such as, deportation/removal proceedings. EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective July 5, 2001.

Supplementary Information

On April 4, 2001 (66 FR 17828) a proposed rule was published in the Federal Register with an invitation to comment. The INS accepted three comments on the proposed rule from interested parties on or before April 13, 2001. One commenter expressed support for the proposed rule. Two commenters believed that exceptions were being made to the Privacy Act. No exceptions were being made to the Privacy Act. As in the proposed rule, the final rule specifically states that exemptions will apply only to the extent that information in the system is subject to exemption. The INS cited the same exemptions for law enforcement records as any other agency that has law enforcement functions. The exemptions are warranted and do not make exceptions that may violate the Privacy Act. This order relates to individuals rather than small business entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order will not have “a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16 Administrative Practices and Procedures, Courts, Freedom of Information Act, Government in the Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act. Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 16 is amended as set forth below. PART 16—[AMENDED] 1. The authority for part 16 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), 553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534, 31 U.S.C. 3717. 2. 28 CFR 16.99 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 16.99 Exemption of the Immigration and Naturalization Service System-limited access. (a) * * * (3) The Immigration and Naturalization Service “National Automated Immigration Lookout System (NAILS) JUSTICE/INS-032.” The exemptions apply only to the extent that records in the system are subject to exemptions pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). Dated: June 21, 2001. Janis A. Sposato, Acting Assistant Attorney General for Administration. [FR Doc. 01-16824 Filed 7-3-01; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 5
3 references not yet in our index
  • 28 CFR 16
  • 5 USC 601-612
  • 18 USC 4203(a)(1)
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite28 CFR 16
Cite5 USC 601-612
Cite18 USC 4203(a)(1)
Cites 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.