Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-06-12 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule

419 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/06/12/01-14609·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 01-14609 · OH140-1b; FRL-6992-1 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions regulations for the Lubrizol Corporation (Lubrizol) in Lake County, Ohio. The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) submitted Director's Final Findings and Orders (Orders) for the Lubrizol facility on November 9, 2000. These Orders are revisions to the Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions are the adjustment of six short-term emissions limits, the addition of an annual emissions limit, and the addition of a continuous emission rate monitoring system (CERMS) requirement for the facility. Three short-term emissions limits are relaxed and three short-term are tightened. There is no increase in the total potential short-term SO 2 emissions.

Dates

The EPA must receive written comments on this proposed rule by July 12, 2001.

Supplementary Information

Throughout this document wherever “we,” “us,” or “our” are used we mean the EPA. Table of Contents I. What actions are EPA taking today? II. Where can I find more information about this proposal and the corresponding direct final rule? I. What Actions Are EPA Taking Today? The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to sulfur dioxide emissions limits for the Lubrizol Corporation facility in Lake County, Ohio. Ohio EPA submitted the revised regulations on November 9, 2000 as an amendment to its SIP. These revisions are the adjustment of six short-term limits (three relaxed and three tightened), the addition of an annual limit, and the requirement of a continuous emission rate monitoring system (CERMS). II. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? For additional information see the direct final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register . Dated: May 18, 2001. David A. Ullrich, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 01-14609 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.