Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-06-01 · National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Final rule

570 words·~3 min read·/register/2001/06/01/01-13809·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 01-13809 · 48 CFR 1811

Summary

This final rule amends the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to specify that use of a priority rating under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) regulation is not required unless the acquisition is in support of one of the Schedule I approved programs of the DPAS. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2001.

Supplementary Information

A. Background Currently, most NASA contracts receive DPAS ratings. This final rule provides that contracts will receive ratings only if they are in support of one of the approved programs in DPAS Schedule I. This change was published as a proposed rule in the Federal Register on September 20, 2000 (65 FR 56859-56860). Comments were received from the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. These comments were considered in the development of the final rule. In response to comments, section 1811.603(e) was changed to provide statutory references covering exceptions to the rating system rather than a detailed listing of these exceptions. Additionally, the proposed rule unintentionally indicated that section 1811.602 was proposed for deletion. This error is corrected in this final rule and an editorial change is made to an organizational code within this section. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act NASA certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 USC 601, et. seq .), because it does not impose any new requirements on offerors or contractors. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the NFS do not impose any recordkeeping or information collection requirements, or collection of information from offerors, contractors, or members of the public that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 USC 3501, et. seq. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1811 Government Procurement. Tom Luedtke, Associate Administrator for Procurement. 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 1811 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1). PART 1811—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS 2. In section 1811.602, amend paragraph (c) by deleting “(Code HS)” and adding “(Code HK)” in its place. 3. Revise section 1811.603 to read as follows: 1811.603 Procedures. (NASA supplements paragraphs (e) and (g).) (e)(i) Rated orders may be used by NASA only as provided in Section 700.17 of the DPAS (15 CFR 700.17) and subject to the limitations provided in Section 700.18 of the DPAS (15 CFR 700.18). Priority ratings are assigned on individual contracts and purchase orders by the contracting officer. (ii) NASA rated orders may only be assigned a DO rating, unless NASA has obtained a DX rating from the Department of Defense. (iii) The following program identification symbols may be used on NASA rated contracts and purchase orders for equipment and services that support authorized programs (see Schedule I of the DPAS): A1—Aircraft A2—Missiles A3—Ships A5—Weapons A6—Ammunition A7—Electronic and Communications Equipment B1—Military Building Supplies B8—Production Equipment (For Contractor's Account) B9—Production Equipment (Government-Owned) C2—Construction C3—Maintenance, Repair, and Operating Supplies for Facilities C9—Miscellaneous/Other (g) Installation requests for assistance shall be directed to the Headquarters Office of Procurement (Code HK). [FR Doc. 01-13809 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4
2 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 1811
  • 42 USC 2473(c)(1)
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 1811
Cite42 USC 2473(c)(1)
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.