Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-03-30 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule; reopening of comment period

809 words·~4 min read·/register/2001/03/30/01-7837·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Action: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period
Citation: 66 FR (No. 62) · FR Doc. 01-7837 · RIN 0910-AA94 · Docket No. 00N-1269 · 21 CFR 201

Summary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reopening to June 22, 2001, the comment period for the proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register of December 22, 2000 (65 FR 81082). The proposed rule would, among other things, require that the labeling of new and recently approved prescription drug and biological products include a section containing highlights of prescribing information and a section containing an index to prescribing information. The agency is extending the comment period in response to a request by a group representing pharmaceutical manufacturers. The agency is taking this action to provide interested persons additional time to submit comments on the proposed rule.

Dates

Submit written or electronic comments by June 22, 2001.

Supplementary Information

I. Background In the Federal Register of December 22, 2000 (65 FR 81082), FDA published proposed regulations that would revise the format of prescription drug and biologic labeling to make it more accessible, readable, and user-friendly for health care professionals. Comments on the proposed rule were to be submitted by March 22, 2001. The proposed format provisions would require that drug product labeling (also known as the “package insert,” “direction circular,” or “package circular ”) be presented in three sections: (1) A section containing highlights of prescribing information, (2) an index section, and (3) a section containing comprehensive prescribing information. The highlights of the prescribing information section would appear first in labeling and would include information that practitioners most commonly refer to and view as most important. Specific headings within this section would also reference the location of more detailed information on a topic. The index section would contain a list of the major and minor subheadings in the comprehensive prescribing information section to assist practitioners in finding specific information of interest to them. The comprehensive prescribing information section would include the detailed information that constitutes current labeling. The proposed rule would reorder and reorganize this information to increase the prominence of important information and make it easier to find. The proposed format changes are based on research FDA conducted with physicians and on comments received from the public in response to a Federal Register document issued, and public meeting held, before the proposed rule. In addition to revising the format of labeling, the proposed rule would make minor changes to its content and establish minimum graphical requirements, including a minimum type size. The proposal would also amend prescription drug labeling requirements for older drugs to require that certain types of statements currently appearing in labeling be removed if they are not sufficiently supported. Finally, the proposal would eliminate certain unnecessary statements that are currently required to appear on prescription drug product labels (i.e., on the immediate container of a drug product) and move other information that is currently required to appear on labels to the labeling (i.e., the package insert). FDA received a request from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America to extend the comment period an additional 90 days. The request stated that the proposed rule raises significant legal, compliance, and implementation issues for the pharmaceutical industry, and that additional time is necessary to formulate a response. In response to this request, and to provide all interested persons additional time to comment on the proposed format changes and other aspects of the proposed rule, FDA is extending the comment period to June 22, 2001. II. Comments Interested persons may by June 22, 2001, submit written or electronic comments regarding the proposed rule. Written comments should be submitted to the Dockets Management Branch (address above). Two copies of any comments are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the office above between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Electronic comments may also be submitted electronically on the Internet at . Once on this Internet site, select “OON-1269 Labeling for Human Prescription Drug/Biologic Products” and follow the directions. Dated: March 23, 2001. Ann M. Witt, Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 01-7837 Filed 3-29-01; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 21 CFR 201
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Proposed rule; reopening of comment period
Cite21 CFR 201
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.