Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-02-12 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

422 words·~2 min read·/register/2001/02/12/01-3379

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-15-U ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [MD105-3054b; FRL-6916-5] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Approval of Opacity Recodifications and Revisions to Visible Emissions COMAR 26.11.06.02 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan
(SIP)revisions submitted by the State of Maryland for the purposes of recodifying Maryland's general opacity regulations and for providing procedures whereby a source may apply for and be granted a federally enforceable alternative visible emission standard. In the Final Rules section of this **Federal Register** , EPA is approving the State's SIP submittals as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views these as noncontroversial submittals and anticipates no adverse comments. A more detailed description of the state submittals and EPA's evaluation are included in a Technical Support Document
(TSD)prepared in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by March 14, 2001. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Denis Lohman, Acting Chief, Technical Assessment Branch, Mailcode 3AP22, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103; and the Maryland Department of the Environment, 2500 Broening Highway, Baltimore, Maryland 21224. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth E. Knapp,
(215)814-2191, at the EPA Region III address above, or by e-mail at knapp.ruth@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information regarding the recodifications to Maryland's general opacity regulations and the procedures by which a source may apply for and be granted an alternative visible emission standard, please see the information provided in the direct final action, with the same title, located in the “Rules and Regulations” section of this **Federal Register** publication. Dated: November 30, 2000. Bradley M. Campbell, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 01-3379 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.