Unknown. Final rule

5,798 words·~26 min read·/register/2001/01/10/01-651

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2001-01-10.xml --- 66 7 Wednesday, January 10, 2001 Contents Agricultural Agricultural Marketing Service PROPOSED RULES Cherries

(tart)grown in— Michigan et al., 1909-1914 01-240 Onions (Vidalia) grown in— Georgia, 1915-1917 01-717 Agriculture Agriculture Department See Agricultural Marketing Service See Commodity Credit Corporation See Forest Service Army Army Department See Engineers Corps NOTICES Patent licenses; non-exclusive, exclusive, or partially exclusive: Apparatus and method for tracking human eye with retinal scanning display, etc., 1959-1960 01-767 Passive determination of projectile miss distance method, 1960 01-768 Chemical Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1947 01-780 Children Children and Families Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 1992 01-634 Coast Guard Coast Guard RULES Boating safety: Recreational vessels operators; Federal blood alcohol concentration standard, 1859-1862 01-551 Drawbridge operations: Virginia, 1863-1864 01-761 PROPOSED RULES Drawbridge operations: Florida, 1923-1925 01-762 Commerce Commerce Department See Export Administration Bureau See International Trade Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 1947 01-718 Commission of Fine Commission of Fine Arts NOTICES Meetings, 1958 01-592 CITA Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements NOTICES Special access and special regime programs: Caribbean Basin countries; participating requirements; temporary amendment; correction, 1958 01-627 Commodity Commodity Credit Corporation RULES Loan and purchase programs: Price support levels— Farmers stock peanuts; cleaning and reinspection, 1807-1810 01-651 Commodity Commodity Futures Trading Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1958 01-889 01-890 01-891 Comptroller Comptroller of the Currency RULES Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; implementation: Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-related agreements; disclosure and reporting, 2051-2113 01-3 Defense Defense Department See Army Department See Engineers Corps RULES Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): Commercial items— Assignment of claims, 2138-2140 01-14 Clause flowdown, 2139-2140 01-15 Cost accounting standards coverage; applicability, thresholds, and waiver, 2135-2137 01-12 Definitions, 2116-2136 01-11 Introduction, 2115-2117 01-282 Non-commercial items— Advance payments, 2136-2139 01-13 Small entity compliance guide, 2140-2142 01-17 Technical amendments, 2139-2141 01-16 NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 1958-1959 01-632 Meetings: Healthcare Quality Initiatives Review Panel, 1959 01-633 Nuclear Weapons Surety Joint Advisory Committee, 1959 01-676 Science Board, 1959 01-675 Drug Drug Enforcement Administration NOTICES Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: B.I. Chemicals, Inc., 2003 01-753 Cerilliant Corp.; correction, 2003 01-758 Chigarene, Inc., 2003 01-747 Medeva Pharmaceuticals CA, Inc., 2004 01-750 National Center for Development of Natural Products, University of Mississippi, 2004 01-756 Norac Co., Inc., 2004 01-757 Noramco, Inc., 2004-2005 01-754 Noramco of Delaware, Inc., 2004 01-748 Organichem Corp., 2005 01-749 Organix, Inc., 2005 01-751 Orpharm, Inc., 2005 01-755 Roxane Laboratories, Inc., 2006 01-752 Education Education Department NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 1962-1963 01-653 Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Elementary and secondary education— Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities National Programs, 1963 01-737 Emergency Immigrant Education Program, 1963-1964 01-736 Employment Employment and Training Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 2007-2008 01-727 01-728 Energy Energy Department See Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission RULES Nuclear safety management; contractor- and government-operated nuclear facilities, 1810-1827 01-608 Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office NOTICES Building energy standards program; energy efficiency improvements in 1998/2000 International Energy Conservation Codes for residential buildings Determinations; State certification requirements, 1964-1970 01-742 Engineers Engineers Corps NOTICES Environmental statements; notice of intent: Everglades National Park, FL; modified water deliveries, 1960 01-770 Kansas City, MO and KS; flood damage reduction study, 1960-1961 01-769 Middlesex, Somerset, and Union Counties, NJ; Green Brook flood control project, 1961-1962 01-766 EPA Environmental Protection Agency RULES Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: Maine, 1871-1875 01-570 Maryland, 1866-1868 01-568 New Hampshire, 1868-1871 01-571 Pesticides; tolerances in food, animal feeds, and raw agricultural commodities: Tebufenozide, 1875-1882 01-574 PROPOSED RULES Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: California, 1927-1930 01-696 Pennsylvania, 1925-1927 01-695 NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 1975-1977 01-694 Pesticide, food, and feed additive petitions: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 1981-1986 01-576 Pesticide registration, cancellation, etc.: Diazinon, 1977-1981 01-466 Superfund; response and remedial actions, proposed settlements, etc: Woody Wilson Battery Site, NC, 1986 01-697 Toxic and hazardous substances control: Lead-based paint activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities; State and Indian Tribe authorization applications— Michigan, 1986-1988 01-577 Executive Executive Office of the President See Trade Representative, Office of United States Export Export Administration Bureau NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 1947-1948 01-625 01-626 Farm Farm Credit Administration NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1988 01-781 FAA Federal Aviation Administration RULES Airworthiness directives: Gulfstream, 1829-1831 01-339 Stemme GmbH & Co., 1827-1829 01-305 Class E airspace, 1831-1832 01-701 Commercial space transportation: Civil penalty actions, 2175-2192 01-554 PROPOSED RULES Airworthiness directives: Airbus, 1917-1921 01-660 01-662 Class E airspace, 1921-1923 01-700 NOTICES Aeronautical land-use assurance; waivers: McGregor Executive Airport, TX, 2039 01-707 Airport noise compatibility program: Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, KY, 2035-2036 01-711 Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport, FL, 2036-2038 01-706 Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, GA, 2038-2039 01-716 Meetings: Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee, 2039-2040 01-714 Passenger facility charges; applications, etc.: Bradley International Airport, CT, 2040 01-713 Cheyenne Airport, WY, 2040-2041 01-709 Indianapolis International Airport, IN, 2041 01-715 North Bend Municipal Airport, OR, 2042-2043 01-708 01-710 Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: Ignition systems on turbine powered aircraft engines; airworthiness certification standards; policy statement, 2043 01-702 Structural dynamic analysis methods for blade containment and rotor unbalance tests; policy statement, 2043 01-703 Time limited dispatch of engines fitted with full authority digital engine control systems; policy statement, 2043-2044 01-704 FCC Federal Communications Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1988-1989 01-842 FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation RULES Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; implementation: Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-related agreements; disclosure and reporting, 2051-2113 01-3 Federal Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NOTICES Electric rate and corporate regulation filings: Panda Gila River, L.P., 1974 01-720 Hydroelectric applications, 1974-1975 01-641 Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: AES Medina Valley Cogen, L.L.C., 1970 01-646 Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. et al., 1970 01-636 Colorado Interstate Gas Co., 1971 01-645 Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., 1971 01-639 Midwestern Gas Transmission Co., 1971-1972 01-637 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 1972 01-638 Southeastern Natural Gas Co., 1972-1973 01-642 Southern Natural Gas Co., 1973 01-640 Tennesse Gas Pipeline Co., 1973 01-719 Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., 1973-1974 01-644 TransColorado Gas Transmission Co., 1974 01-643 Federal Housing Federal Housing Finance Board NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 1989-1990 01-733 Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1990 01-972 FMC Federal Maritime Commission NOTICES Agreements; additional information requests: United States Australasia Agreement, 1990 01-738 Agreements filed, etc., 1990 01-739 Ocean transportation intermediary licenses: Amex International, Inc., et al., 1990-1991 01-740 Federal Railroad Federal Railroad Administration RULES Track safety standards: Gage restraint measuring systems ; proper gage management, 1894-1901 01-590 PROPOSED RULES Railroad workplace safety: Roadway maintenance machine safety, 1930-1945 01-591 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System RULES Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; implementation: Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-related agreements; disclosure and reporting, 2051-2113 01-3 NOTICES Banks and bank holding companies: Change in bank control, 1991 01-760 Formations, acquisitions, and mergers, 1991 01-616 Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1992 01-782 Fine Arts Fine Arts Commission See Commission of Fine Arts Fish Fish and Wildlife Service RULES Marine mammals: Polar bear trophies; importation from Canada; change in finding for M’Clintock Channel population, 1901-1907 01-656 NOTICES Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Asbestos Dump Superfund Site, Morris County, NJ, 1999 01-593 Food Food and Drug Administration RULES Animal drugs, feeds, and related products: Decoquinate, monensin, and tylosin, 1832-1834 01-628 Biological products: Blood, blood components, and source plasma requirements, revisions, 1834-1837 01-533 Human drugs: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; antibiotic drug certification; technical amendment, 1832 01-680 NOTICES Medical devices: Patent extension; regulatory review period determinations— Synvisc Hylan G-F 20 (4,713,448), 1992-1993 01-681 Synvisc Hylan G-F 20 (5,143,724), 1993-1994 01-683 Meetings: 2001 FDA Science Forum - Science Across the Boundaries, 1994-1995 01-629 Medical Devices Advisory Committee, 1995 01-682 Forest Forest Service RULES National Forest System land resource management planning: Plans amendment or revision; decisions review; interpretive rule, 1864-1866 01-615 GSA General Services Administration RULES Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): Commercial items— Assignment of claims, 2138-2140 01-14 Clause flowdown, 2139-2140 01-15 Cost accounting standards coverage; applicability, thresholds, and waiver, 2135-2137 01-12 Definitions, 2116-2136 01-11 Introduction, 2115-2117 01-282 Non-commercial items— Advance payments, 2136-2139 01-13 Small entity compliance guide, 2140-2142 01-17 Technical amendments, 2139-2141 01-16 NOTICES Acquisition regulations: Space Requirements Worksheet (SF 81A); form cancellation, 1992 01-665 Geological Geological Survey NOTICES Grant and cooperative agreement awards: Florida International University, 1999-2000 01-618 Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Federal Geographic Data Committee; National Spatial Data Infrastructure Cooperative Agreements Program, 2000 01-617 Health Health and Human Services Department See Children and Families Administration See Food and Drug Administration See Health Care Financing Administration Health Health Care Financing Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 1995-1996 01-672 01-673 01-674 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 1997 01-671 Housing Housing and Urban Development Department NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 1997 01-630 Low income housing: Housing assistance payments (Section 8)— Operating cost adjustment factors, 1997-1999 01-771 Interior Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service See Geological Survey See Land Management Bureau See National Park Service See Reclamation Bureau IRS Internal Revenue Service RULES Excise taxes: Excess benefit transactions, 2143-2172 01-256 Group health plans; continuation coverage requirements, 1843-1859 01-5 Income taxes: Cafeteria plans; tax treatment, 1837-1843 01-258 PROPOSED RULES Excise taxes: Excess benefit transactions; cross-reference, 2172-2174 01-257 Income taxes: Cafeteria plans; tax treatment; cross-reference, 1923 01-259 International International Trade Administration NOTICES Antidumping: Electrolytic manganese dioxide from— Greece, 1950-1952 01-776 Japan, 1948-1950 01-775 Hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality steel products from— Japan, 1952 01-778 Sulfanilic acid from— China, 1952-1953 01-779 Tapered roller bearings and parts, finished and unfinished, from— China, 1953-1956 01-777 Justice Justice Department See Drug Enforcement Administration Labor Labor Department See Employment and Training Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 2006-2007 01-729 Land Land Management Bureau RULES Minerals management: Oil and gas leasing— Federal and Indian oil and gas resources; protection against drainage by operations on nearby lands that would result in lower royalties from Federal leases, 1883-1894 01-446 NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration RULES Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): Commercial items— Assignment of claims, 2138-2140 01-14 Clause flowdown, 2139-2140 01-15 Cost accounting standards coverage; applicability, thresholds, and waiver, 2135-2137 01-12 Definitions, 2116-2136 01-11 Introduction, 2115-2117 01-282 Non-commercial items— Advance payments, 2136-2139 01-13 Small entity compliance guide, 2140-2142 01-17 Technical amendments, 2139-2141 01-16 National National Council on Disability NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 2008-2009 01-971 National Highway National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOTICES Motor vehicle safety standards: Nonconforming vehicles— Importation eligibility; determinations, 2044-2045 01-698 Motor vehicle safety standards; exemption petitions, etc.: Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 2046-2047 01-699 NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RULES Fishery conservation and management: Atlantic highly migratory species— Pelagic longline fishery; vessel monitoring systems, 1907-1908 01-448 PROPOSED RULES Fishery conservation and management: West Coast States and Western Pacific fisheries— Coral reef ecosystems; hearings, 1945-1946 01-774 NOTICES Permits: Endangered and threatened species, 1956-1957 01-773 Marine mammals, 1957-1958 01-772 National Park National Park Service NOTICES Meetings: Golden Gate National Recreation Area and Point Reyes National Seashore Advisory Commission, 2000-2001 01-620 National Register of Historic Places: Pending nominations, 2001 01-619 Native American human remains and associated funerary objects: Agate Fossil Beds National Monument et al., NE— Inventory from Nebraska panhandle region; correction, 2001-2002 01-649 Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOTICES Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Nuclear Management Co., LLC, 2009-2010 01-731 Meetings: Nuclear materials regulatory process; case studies on gas chromatographs, static eliminators, and fixed gauges; risk information use, 2010 01-732 Operating licenses, amendments; no significant hazards considerations; biweekly notices, 2010-2031 01-596 Office of U.S. Trade Office of United States Trade Representative See Trade Representative, Office of United States Public Public Health Service See Food and Drug Administration Reclamation Reclamation Bureau NOTICES Meetings: Bay-Delta Advisory Council, 2002-2003 01-658 Research Research and Special Programs Administration NOTICES Hazardous materials transportation safety program; reauthorization, 2047-2048 01-763 SEC Securities and Exchange Commission NOTICES Investment Company Act of 1940: Exemption applications— Frank Russell Investment Co. et al., 2031-2034 01-650 Surface Surface Transportation Board NOTICES Railroad services abandonment: Central Kansas Railway, L.L.C., 2048 01-734 Textile Textile Agreements Implementation Committee See Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements Thrift Thrift Supervision Office RULES Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; implementation: Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-related agreements; disclosure and reporting, 2051-2113 01-3 Trade Trade Representative, Office of United States NOTICES Generalized System of Preferences: 2000 annual country eligibility practices review; petitions submission deadline; Swaziland worker rights review terminated, etc., 2034-2035 01-759 Transportation Transportation Department See Coast Guard See Federal Aviation Administration See Federal Railroad Administration See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration See Research and Special Programs Administration See Surface Transportation Board Treasury Treasury Department See Comptroller of the Currency See Internal Revenue Service See Thrift Supervision Office NOTICES Meetings: Debt Management Advisory Committee, 2048-2049 01-647 Veterans Veterans Affairs Department NOTICES Meetings: Rehabilitation Research and Development Service Scientific Merit Review Board, 2049 01-621 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision; Federal Reserve System; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 2051-2113 01-3 Part III Department of Defense; General Services Administration; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2115-2142 01-282 01-11 01-12 01-13 01-14 01-15 01-16 01-17 Part IV Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, 2143-2174 01-256 01-257 Part V Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 2175-2192 01-554 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, reminders, and notice of recently enacted public laws. 66 7 Wednesday, January 10, 2001 Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Commodity Credit Corporation 7 CFR Part 1446 RIN 0560-AF56 Cleaning and Reinspection of Farmers Stock Peanuts AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Commodity Credit Corporation is adopting, as a final rule, with certain changes, the provisions of an August 5, 1998, interim rule that eased conditions for marketing Segregation 3 peanuts. The interim rule allowed peanut producers to recondition and regrade peanuts in certain limited instances. Peanuts are graded as “Segregation 3” peanuts when they are found by visual inspection to have Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) mold. This rule changes the provisions of the interim rule to allow peanuts found to have the mold to be cleaned at a different buying point if the buying point to which a producer delivered the peanuts does not have cleaning facilities. In addition, this rule formally extends the time for having the peanuts visually reinspected to 72 hours and, under certain conditions, allows reinspection at an alternate site. This rule continues to limit reinspection to only once for any given lot. Comments solicited in the interim rule with respect to chemical inspection of farmers stock peanuts are discussed in this rule. However, no change has been made at this time with respect to that issue. In addition, this rule makes certain other technical/administrative changes to the program regulations. One of those is a provision allowing for waivers of non statutory program requirements in cases where such waivers serve the purposes of the program. Secondly, the rule drops a provision which refers to a defunct crop insurance procedure. DATES: Effective January 10, 2001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Kincannon,

(202)720-7914. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866 For purposes of Executive Order 12866, this rule has been determined to be not significant and has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act is not applicable to this interim rule because the Commodity Credit Corporation is not required by 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other provision of law to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking with respect to the subject matter of this rule. Environmental Evaluation It has been determined by an environmental evaluation that this action will have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is needed. Unfunded Federal Mandates This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. Federal Assistance Program The title and number of the Federal Assistance Program, as found in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, to which this final rule applies are: Commodity Loans and Purchases—10.051. Executive Order 12372 This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR 29115 (June 24, 1983). Executive Order 12988 This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12988. The provisions of this rule do not preempt State laws to the extent that such laws are consistent with the provisions of this rule. Before any legal action is brought regarding determinations made under provisions of 7 CFR part 1446, the administrative appeal provisions set forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted. National Appeals Division Rules of Procedure The procedures set out in 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 apply to appeals of adverse decisions made under the regulations adopted in this notice. Paperwork Reduction Act The information reporting requirements contained in this rule have been approved by OMB and assigned OMB control number 0560-0014. The provisions of this rule do not impose new reporting requirements or changes in existing information collection requirements. Background In the August 5, 1998, **Federal Register** , CCC issued changes in the peanut poundage quota regulations at 7 CFR Part 1446 with respect to determining Segregation 3 peanuts. The rule modified the definition of Segregation 3 peanuts found in § 1446.103 by providing that peanuts found to have visible A. flavus mold upon a visual inspection at a buying point may be reconditioned and regraded in certain limited instances. For many years peanuts found to have visible A. flavus mold were required to be marketed as additional loan peanuts or as quota peanuts returned to the farm for seed. Although no cleaning was allowed, the impact of the inspection on farmers was mitigated by the availability of “disaster transfers” which allowed a transfer of additional loan peanuts to a quota loan pool. Those transfers did not change the ultimate use of the peanuts but did allow the farmer to receive a return close to that for quota peanuts if the farmer otherwise had unused quota. The Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform act of 1996 (1996 Act) substantially limited the quantity and price on such transfers but did not mandate the particular procedures by which peanuts would be classified as Segregation 3 peanuts. To mitigate possible harm to individual farmers with Segregation 3 peanuts, farmers whose peanuts are found to contain visible A. flavus mold were allowed by the interim rule to have the peanuts reconditioned by removing foreign material and loose shelled kernels (LSK's) in accordance with directions to be issued by the Director of the Tobacco and Peanuts Division of the Farm Service Agency. Comments were requested on the interim rule. Also, the preamble to that rule requested comments on whether there should be chemical testing undertaken with respect to the delivery of all farmers stock peanuts. It was noted, however, that chemical testing for wholesomeness was already being undertaken, under other authorities, at a later marketing stage. Specifically, comments were requested with respect to the efficiency of such testing, standards for such testing and the assignment of costs for such testing. A total of 25 comments was received during the comment period, representing three area peanut grower associations, seven State peanut grower organizations, a State peanut organization, a State farmer organization, a national peanut sheller organization, six members of Congress, three Senators, an individual sheller/handler, a national peanut manufacturer organization, and a law firm representing certain peanut producers. One area peanut grower association, one State peanut grower organization, the national peanut manufacturer organization, and the national peanut shellers association opposed the change to allow regrading. The remaining 21 respondents generally supported the change to allow cleaning and reinspection. The respondents raised three primary issues:

(1)Since not all buying points have cleaning facilities, there is a need for removing peanuts from the buying point to a location having such facilities,

(2)tracking loads of peanuts cleaned and presented for reinspection may present problems, and

(3)producers may need more than 24 hours to have peanuts cleaned and reinspected. First of all, with respect to the general issues raised (whether to allow recleaning at all) it remains the view of the agency that the rule should allow for regrading and recleaning. That allowance can help avoid hardship to farmers. So far, the allowance of recleaning has not appeared to present a problem as far as the administration of the price support system. The only material potential problem would be the potential diversion to quota loan pools of peanuts that have been recleaned but which might not be purchased out of the inventory at full price because a buyer knows that the peanuts have been recleaned. So far, there does not appear to be any loan problems of that kind. However, because pool losses can spread to all farmers under the statutory system that is now in place, the agency will continue to monitor this situation to insure fairness to all. We now address the other issues raised and the two additional rule changes undertaken in this notice: 1. Removing Peanuts From the Buying Point To Facilitate Reconditioning of Segregation 3 Peanuts Twelve respondents, both those in support of the rule and those opposed, expressed concern about tracking those loads of peanuts removed from the buying point for cleaning to assure the same peanuts were returned for regrading. One area peanut grower association in support of the interim rule stated that buying points without cleaning facilities should be allowed off-site cleaning in order to implement the interim rule on a fair and equitable basis for all buying points. One State grower association and one area peanut grower association opposed the interim rule based, in part, on the premise it would be necessary for peanuts to be removed for cleaning if the buying point did not have cleaning facilities. Also, in support of the rule, a State grower association and a State peanut commission commented that they believed loads of peanuts removed from the buying point could be tracked and monitored. An area peanut grower association and three State peanut grower associations supported the interim rule as issued and emphasized that peanuts should not leave the buying point. In some cases it may well be that the buying point to which the farmer takes the farm's peanuts may not be a location where recleaning is possible. Accordingly, not allowing the peanuts to be recleaned elsewhere could have a serious effect on the marketing decisions made by producers and could interfere with normal operations of private buying points and producers. On the other hand, control of the peanuts is important because of the possible effect on the loan program if buyers refuse to buy peanuts that have been moved for fear that the presence of the mold has been obscured by re mixing of the peanuts. Such fears, should they occur, could affect the marketability of the peanuts. In turn, the lack of marketability could produce price support loan losses. Hence, this raises the same general concern as the question of whether to allow recleaning at all and we reach the same result as with the general question as there does not appear to be strong evidence to indicate that there will be serious interference with the price support program if this allowance is made. In the absence of such evidence, the agency is reluctant to interfere with established marketing relationships. Accordingly, the final rule does not require that recleaning take place at the same location where the peanuts are first presented for marketing if that buying point does not have its own cleaning facilities. 2. 24-Hour Period for Cleaning and Reinspection In the interim rule, the agency generally allowed 24 hours for the recleaning to take place but did provide explicitly for authority to extend that period if the Director of the Tobacco and Peanuts Division

(TPD)of the Farm Service Agency

(FSA)saw fit to do so. A number of comments addressed this issue. One area peanut grower association and three State peanut grower associations supported the interim rule as written with a 24-hour reinspection turnaround. One area peanut grower association, three State peanut grower associations, one State peanut organization, six members of Congress, and three Senators supported the interim rule but also suggested either a 24-hour turnaround was not enough time or requested allowing 72 hours for peanuts to be cleaned and reinspected. One area peanut grower association and one State peanut grower association opposed the interim rule based, in part, on the assertion that 24 hours was not enough time to have the peanuts cleaned and regraded. Following issuance of the interim rule, FSA issued procedures implementing the changes to allow reconditioning and reinspection of farmers stock peanuts. As the marketing of 1998 crop peanuts began, certain buying points that did not have cleaning facilities but had peanut producers who wanted their peanuts cleaned and regraded requested that TPD grant relief to allow the peanuts to be cleaned at a different buying point. In order to provide equity to all producers, under the provisions of the interim rule, the Director of TPD, FSA, issued instructions to allow 72 hours for cleaning and regrading and buying points without cleaning facilities to move the peanuts to an alternate buying point for cleaning and reinspection. We have estimated that fewer than 350 loads of peanuts were cleaned and reinspected during the 1999 crop with most occurring in the Southeast marketing area. This represents a 30 percent decrease from year-earlier amounts of peanuts cleaned and reinspected under this provision. We estimate that about 65 percent of the reinspected peanuts were able to qualify as Segregation 1 peanuts. Here also, the same concerns are at play. Those concerns were identified in the comments of several respondents who expressed the concern that reinspected peanuts would be viewed as “hot” with respect to undetected A. flavus mold and thereby cause pool losses. However, the relative small amount of peanuts cleaned and reinspected did not have a significant impact on the peanut price support loan program. Having decided that off-premises recleaning should be allowed, it follows that the recleaning period should not be limited to 24 hours as it may not be possible for the recleaning to be done in that period of time. However, this concern is not limited only to those situations, as 24 hours may also be too short in some instances at buying points with cleaning facilities at times when many peanuts are being delivered at once or whether there is an equipment failure or, for that matter, a holiday. Accordingly, subject to continued oversight, the rule allows for a 72 hour period for the process of recleaning and regrading to be completed. 3. Chemical Testing of Farmers Stock Peanuts for Aflatoxin With respect to chemical testing, the issue has been whether or not there would be a requirement of some kind of chemical testing before farmers stock peanuts can be marketed—currently, there is a visual inspection of the peanuts though, as indicated, such inspections are designed for the administration of the price support program and assigning a value to the peanuts. Wholesomeness concerns with respect to the human consumption of peanuts takes place as needed further along in the marketing process and is not under the jurisdiction of CCC. Nor is CCC, as such, a regulator of the marketing of peanuts except as needed to operate the price support program itself and to administer the production restriction provisions which are tied into the price support system. However, because of concerns that undetected problems could produce losses to buyers later on, there has been a debate within the industry about whether there should be chemical testing of all farmer stock peanut deliveries. In light of that debate and its connection with the recleaning issue, the interim rule asked for comment on whether chemical testing should be required for all marketings, as opposed to being left to individual determinations by individual buyers. A number of comments were received. One area peanut grower association and four State peanut grower organizations opposed the use of chemical testing of farmers stock peanuts. Concerns about adverse impacts on peanut producers, increased expense, delays in peanut delivery and environmental impacts of chemicals used for testing were issues raised by the respondents. A national peanut sheller organization and a national peanut product manufacturer organization, two State peanut grower organizations and a State peanut commission supported the use of chemical testing as a more accurate and consistent test for reflecting the aflatoxin content in farmers stock peanuts. These respondents pointed to studies that show occurrences of excess aflatoxin in peanuts graded as Segregation 1 and relatively low levels of aflatoxin in peanuts grading Segregation 3. The respondents emphasized that the studies show that the current visual inspection method of grading farmers stock peanuts for A. flavus mold is not a definitive indicator of aflatoxin content of the inspected peanuts. A sheller/handler acknowledged the need to enhance the peanut grading system and, without addressing chemical testing directly, stressed the need to remove subjectivity from the testing process. Several respondents urged using available technology in the grading process while protecting the integrity of the peanut price support program and its function for peanut producers. Discussion by respondents included incorporation of marketing and grading procedures based on the field application of beneficial mold that studies suggest decreases the likelihood of the occurrence of aflatoxin in peanuts produced on such fields. In addition, several respondents suggested that incoming grade requirements with respect to visual inspection for A. flavus mold or aflatoxin content be eliminated for commercial peanut sales. Since handlers are subject to outgoing quality standards based on chemical testing for aflatoxin, the respondents reasoned that there is no real justification for testing farmers stock peanuts. Discussions on the issue of chemical testing of farmer stock peanuts continue in the industry and, so far, no consensus has been reached. Thus for example, no provisions have been added to the Peanut Marketing Agreement, an agreement which for the most part is the product of recommendations of a joint group of producers and buyers. Issues which come into play in the question concern the type of testing that would be required, whether it would be required in all cases, and who would pay for the testing. Given that lack of unanimity on this issue and the lack of unanimity of treatment in the marketplace, there does not appear to be an established market practice which the price support system needs to insure that peanuts are properly valued for price support purposes to avoid pool losses. For that reason and given the limited purposes of the price support program, there does not appear to be reason at this time for a change in the program regulations regarding this issue. However, private concerns remain free to engage in whatever additional testing they feel is needed to protect their interests in the marketplace. 4. Modification of § 1446.307 In § 1446.307 of the regulations, specifically in paragraph

(g)of that section, it is provided that disaster transfers cannot be made from an additional peanut loan pool to a quota loan pool if the producer has executed a waiver of the right in connection with the acquisition of crop insurance benefits from the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC), or other federal agency. Apparently, FCIC has, in the past, been the only federal agency to require such a waiver. Because, however, it is understood that such waivers are no longer required by FCIC, this provision is removed in this rule. 5. Modification of § 1446.102 In § 1446.102, provisions are set out which govern the general administration of the price support program. In that connection, in order to assure maximum flexibility for the agency in dealing with new problems as they may arise, a new provision is being added to the regulations which allows the Director of TPD, FSA, to approve variances from the regulations where the variance does not involve a statutory requirement and where such a variance would serve the purposes of the overall administration of the program. This authority would, however, only be used sparingly to deal with new and developing issues or to resolve disputes and supplements whatever flexibility is already granted by other terms of the regulations, or granted elsewhere. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1446 Loan programs—agriculture, reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set out in the preamble, the amendments to 7 CFR part 1446 contained in the interim rule issued August 5, 1998, are adopted as a final rule with the following change: PART 1446—PEANUTS 1. The authority citation for part 7 CFR part 1446 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7271; 15 U.S.C. 714b and 714c. 2. Paragraph

(c)of § 1446.102 is amended by adding a new sentence to the end of the paragraph to read as follows: § 1446.102 Administration.

(c)*Supervisory authority.* * * * Further, the Director of TPD, FSA, may authorize the wavier or modification of deadlines and other requirements, except statutory deadlines or requirements, in cases where lateness or the failure to meet such other requirements does not adversely affect operation of the program. 3. Paragraph

(3)of the definition of “Segregations” in § 1446.103 is revised to read as follows: § 1446.103 Definitions.

(3)*Segregation 3. * Segregation 3 peanuts are farmers stock peanuts which, upon visible inspection, are found to contain Aspergillus flavus mold: *Provided further, however,* That, in accordance with such written instructions as the Director may issue, the Director shall permit producers at approved buying points as specified by the Director to have the Segregation 3 lot reconditioned, one time only, and then reinspected visually. If the buying point where the peanuts were initially delivered does not have adequate cleaning facilities, CCC may approve an alternative buying point for cleaning and reinspection. The visual reinspection may not occur more than 72 hours from the initial inspection except as permitted by the Director and the second grade shall be considered the final grade for the farmers stock peanuts. § 1444.307 [Amended] 4. Section 1444.307 is amended by removing paragraph

(g)from that section. Signed at Washington, D.C., on January 3, 2001. Keith Kelly, Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation. [FR Doc. 01-651 Filed 1-9-01; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

U.S. Code

2 references not yet in our index