Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-01-05 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice

785 words·~4 min read·/register/2001/01/05/01-265

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 00N-1534] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Year 2000 Continuation of the National Surveys of Prescription Drug Information Provided to Patients AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is announcing that the proposed collection of information listed below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Submit written comments on the collection of information by February 5, 2001. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, New Executive Office Bldg., 725 17th St. NW., rm. 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Wendy Taylor, Desk Officer for FDA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen L. Nelson, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Year 2000 Continuation of the National Surveys of Prescription Drug Information Provided to Patients FDA implements the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) designed to assure the adequate labeling of prescription
(Rx)drugs. Under section 502(a) of the act (21 U.S.C. 352(a)), a drug product is misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular, and under section 201(n) of the act (21 U.S.C. 321(n)), a drug’s labeling is misleading if its labeling or advertising fails to reveal material facts. FDA also has the authority to collect this information under Title VI of Public Law 104-180 (Related Agencies and Food and Drug Administration) section 601 (Effective Medication Guides), which directs the development of “a mechanism to assess periodically * * * the frequency with which the [oral and written prescription] information is provided to consumers.” To assure that Rx drugs are not misbranded, FDA has historically asserted that adequate labeling requires certain information be provided to patients. In 1982, when FDA revoked a planned initiative to require mandatory patient package inserts for all Rx drugs in favor of private sector initiatives, the agency indicated that it will periodically conduct surveys to evaluate the availability of adequate patient information on a nationwide basis. In addition, FDA has been responsible for setting and tracking Healthy People 2000 goals and now for Healthy People 2010 goals for the receipt of medication information by patients. Surveys of consumers about their receipt of Rx drug information were carried out in 1982, 1984, 1992, 1994, 1996, and 1998. This notice is in regard to conducting the survey in 2000. The survey is conducted by telephone on a national random sample of adults who received a new prescription for themselves or a household member within the past 4 weeks. The interview assesses the extent to which oral and written information were received from the doctor, the pharmacist, and other sources. Survey respondents are also asked attitudinal questions, and demographic and other background characteristics are obtained. The survey enables FDA to determine the frequency with which such information is provided to consumers. Without this information, the agency would be unable to assess the degree to which adequate patient information and counseling about Rx drugs is provided. Respondents to this collection of information are adults (18 years or older) in the continental United States who have obtained a new (nonrefill) prescription at a pharmacy for themselves or a member of their household in the last 4 weeks. This survey may be seen online at http://www.fda.gov/cder/ddmac/y2ktitle.htm. In the **Federal Register** of October 6, 2000 (65 FR 59849), FDA invited comments on the proposed information collection. No significant comments were received. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: **Table** 1.—Estimated Annual Reporting Burden 1 : Screener Year No. of Respondents Annual Frequency per Response Total Annual Responses Hours per Response Total Hours 2000 9,643 1 9,643 .03 289 Total 289 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information **Table** 2.—Annual Reporting Burden 1 : Survey Year No. of Respondents Annual Frequency per Response Total Annual Responses Hours per Response Total Hours 2000 1,000 1 1,000 .32 320 Total 320 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information This total estimate of 609 total annual burden hours is based on the 1998 survey administration, in which 9,643 potential respondents were contacted to obtain 1,000 interviews. Dated: December 27, 2000. Margaret M. Dotzel, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 01-265 Filed 1-4-01; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-180
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-180
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.