Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2001-01-02 · National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Extension of comment period

599 words·~3 min read·/register/2001/01/02/00-33455·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT
Action: Extension of comment period
Citation: FR Doc. 00-33455 · RIN 2127-AH67 · Docket No. NHTSA-2000-8159; Notice 2 · 49 CFR 567, 591, 592, 594

Summary

This document grants a request to extend the comment period on an agency proposal, principally to amend the regulations pertaining to registered importers of motor vehicles not originally manufactured to conform with the Federal motor vehicle safety, bumper, and theft prevention standards. The agency also proposed associated amendments to allied regulations. The agency is extending the comment period an additional four weeks.

Dates

Comments must be received on or before the close of business on February 1, 2001 (the comments were originally due on January 4, 2001).

Supplementary Information

On November 20, 2000, NHTSA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to amend 49 CFR part 592, Registered Importers of Vehicles Not Originally Manufactured to Conform with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (65 FR 69810). The NPRM also proposed conforming amendments to 49 CFR part 567, Certification, 49 CFR part 591, Importation of Vehicles and Equipment Subject to Federal Safety, Bumper and Theft Prevention Standards, and 49 CFR part 594, Schedule of Fees Authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141. The NPRM specified a comment closing date of January 4, 2001 (45 days after the date of publication). However, on December 22, 2000, the agency received a written request for an extension of the comment closing date from the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA). AAMVA said that it wishes to provide comments on the proposal but that “the time needed to consult with AAMVA's member jurisdictions will not permit the association to submit comments by the January 4, 2001 deadline.” AAMVA requested an extension “to allow the Association additional time to complete its review of the notice and the many issues raised for consideration.” The agency may grant a person's petition for an extension of a comment period if the petition shows good cause for the extension, and if the extension is consistent with the public interest (49 CFR 553.19). The agency concludes that the petitioner has made that showing and that an extension is in the public interest. An extension would aid AAMVA and other interested persons (such as American Honda Motor Co., which made an oral request for an extension) in fully responding to the changes proposed. Accordingly, this notice extends the comment closing date an additional four weeks, to February 1, 2001. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, and 30166; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 49 CFR 501.8. Issued on: December 27, 2000. Kenneth N. Weinstein, Associate Administrator for Safety Assurance. [FR Doc. 00-33455 Filed 12-27-00; 4:24 pm]

Connectionstraces to 2
7 references not yet in our index
  • 49 CFR 592
  • 49 CFR 567
  • 49 CFR 591
  • 49 CFR 594
  • 49 CFR 553.19
  • 49 CFR 1.50
  • 49 CFR 501.8
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Extension of comment period
Cite49 CFR 592
Cite49 CFR 567
Cite49 CFR 591
Cite49 CFR 594
Cite49 CFR 553.19
Cites 9 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.