Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-12-28 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of intent to rule on application

600 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/12/28/00-33189·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT
Action: Notice of intent to rule on application
Citation: FR Doc. 00-33189

Summary

The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC at Pitt-Greenville Airport under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

Dates

Comments must be received on or before January 29, 2001.

Supplementary Information

The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC at Pitt-Greenville Airport under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). On December 19, the FAA determined that the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC submitted by Pitt Company—City of Greenville Airport Authority was substantially complete within the requirements of section 158.25 of Part 158. The FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or in part, no later than March 30, 2001. The following is a brief overview of the application. PFC Application No.: 01-02-C-00-PGV. Level of the proposed PFC: $4.50 Proposed charge effective date: July 1, 2001 Proposed charge expiration date: May 1, 2009 Total estimated net PFC revenue: $1,480,404 Brief description of proposed project(s): Impose and Use: Environmental Assessment Extend Runway 19 (500 ft. (to 6,000′)) Update Airport Layout Plan Taxiway A Extension Design Rehab/Relocation of Taxiways A & B, and Air Carrier Apron Disaster Recovery—ARFF Building Rehab Disaster Recovery—Rehab Runways Disaster Recovery—Airfield Lighting Rehab Disaster Recovery—Install Instrument Approach Aids Disaster Recovery—Rehab Terminal Building Prepare PFC Application Runway 2 Safety Area Improvements Taxiway A Relocation Air Carrier Apron Rehab Taxiway B Rehab ARFF Vehicle Land Acquisition Use: Install Approach Lighting System Extend RW 19 (500 ft.-to 6,500′) Class or classes of air carriers which the public agency has requested not be required to collect PFCs: None Any person may inspect the application in person at the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the Pitt County—City of Greenville Airport Authority. Dated: Issued in Atlanta, GA on December 12, 2000. Rans D. Black, Acting Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, Southern Region. [FR Doc. 00-33189 Filed 12-27-00; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 101-508
  • 14 CFR 158
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of intent to rule on application
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101-508
Cite14 CFR 158
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.