Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-12-13 · Department of Defense (DoD) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

464 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/12/13/00-31602

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Parts 217, 219, and 236 [DFARS Case 2000-D015] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; North American Industry Classification System AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Director of Defense Procurement is adopting as final, without change, an interim rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). The rule converts programs based on the Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC)system to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), in accordance with the final rule issued by the Small Business Administration
(SBA)on May 15, 2000. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 2000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Susan Schneider, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD(AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone
(703)602-0326; facsimile
(703)602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2000-D015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background SBA issued a final rule at 65 FR 30836 on May 15, 2000, providing a new size standards listing that is based on NAICS rather than SIC codes. The SBA rule requires Federal agencies to use the new size standards to determine whether a business is a small business concern. An interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation was published at 65 FR 46055 on July 26, 2000, to establish policy for use of the new size standards in Government acquisitions. DoD published an interim rule at 65 FR 50148 on August 17, 2000, to make corresponding changes to the DFARS. One source submitted comments on the interim DFARS rule. DoD considered those comments in the decision to convert the interim rule to a final rule without change. This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.,* because this rule implements the final rule issued by SBA on May 15, 2000, and SBA has certified that the impact of the change from SIC to NAICS on each business will not be substantial. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 217, 219, and 236 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council. Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR Parts 217, 219, 236, and Appendix I to Chapter 2, which was published at 65 FR 50148 on August 17, 2000, is adopted as a final rule without change. [FR Doc. 00-31602 Filed 12-12-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.