Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-12-05 · Office of the Secretary · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

578 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/12/05/00-30472·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Secretary
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-30472 · OSD Administrative Instruction 81 · 32 CFR 311

Summary

The Office of the Secretary is proposing to add an exemption rule for a Privacy Act system of records. The exemption is intended to increase the value of the system of records and to protect the privacy of individuals identified in the system of records.

Dates

Comments must be received on or before February 5, 2001 to be considered by this agency.

Supplementary Information

Executive Order 12866 It has been determined that this Privacy Act rule for the Department of Defense does not constitute ‘significant regulatory action’. Analysis of the rule indicates that it does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; does not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; does not materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; does not raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in Executive Order 12866 (1993). Regulatory Flexibility Act It has been determined that this Privacy Act rule for the Department of Defense does not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Paperwork Reduction Act It has been determined that this Privacy Act rule for the Department of Defense imposes no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 311 Privacy. 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 311 continues to read as follows: Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). 2. Section 311.8 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(7) to read as follows: § 311.8 Procedures for exemptions. (c) * * * (7) System identifier and name: DGC 20, DoD Presidential Appointee Vetting File. (i) Exemption: Investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for federal civilian employment, military service, federal contracts, or access to classified information may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), but only to the extent that such material would reveal the identity of a confidential source. Portions of this system of records that may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) are subsections (d)(1) through (d)(5). (ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5). (iii) Reason: From (d)(1) through (d)(5) because the agency is required to protect the confidentiality of sources who furnished information to the government under an expressed promise of confidentiality or, prior to September 27, 1975, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence. This confidentiality is needed to maintain the Government's continued access to information from persons who otherwise might refuse to give it. Dated: November 22, 2000. L.M. Bynum, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense . [FR Doc. 00-30472 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
3 references not yet in our index
  • 32 CFR 311
  • Pub. L. 93-579
  • 88 Stat. 1896
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite32 CFR 311
Pub. L.Pub. L. 93-579
Stat.88 Stat. 1896
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.