Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-11-14 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Notices

Notices. Proposed rule

431 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/11/14/00-28708

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P 65 220 Tuesday, November 14, 2000 Proposed Rules ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [NH-042-7169b; A-1-FRL-6871-1] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire, New Hampshire—Nitrogen Oxides Budget and Allowance Trading Program AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan
(SIP)revisions submitted by the State of New Hampshire (NH). The revisions consists of adding CHAPTER Env-A 3200 NO <sup>X</sup> BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM, NO <sup>X</sup> RACT Order 98-001, and two emission quantification protocols to the NH SIP. The regulations and source specific order in NH are part of a regional nitrogen oxides (NO <sup>X</sup> ) emissions budget and allowance trading program designed to reduce stationary source NO <sup>X</sup> emissions during the ozone season in the Ozone Transport Region of the northeastern United States. These SIP revisions were submitted pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. In the Final Rules section of this **Federal Register** EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 14, 2000. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David Conroy, Unit Manager, Air Quality Planning, Office of Ecosystem protection (mail code CAQ), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-New England, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114-2023. Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support document are available for public inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston, MA, and at the New Hampshire Air Resources Division, Department of Environmental Services, 6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03301. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Brown,
(617)918-1532 or at brown.dan@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this **Federal Register** . Dated: September 6, 2000. Mindy S. Lubber, Regional Administrator, EPA-New England. [FR Doc. 00-28708 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.