Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-11-13 · International Trade Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice

474 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/11/13/00-28981·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: International Trade Commission
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 00-28981 · Inv. No. 337-TA-429

Summary

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to extend by one week, or until November 9, 2000, the deadline for determining whether to review an initial determination (ID) (Order No. 5) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (ALJ) in the above-captioned investigation.

Supplementary Information

The Commission instituted this investigation on March 13, 2000, based on a complaint filed by American Tool Companies, Inc. (“American Tool”) of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, and Peterson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“Peterson”) of DeWitt, Nebraska (collectively “complainants”). 65 FR 13307. On September 6, 2000, complainants filed a motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation asserting that respondents no longer ship infringing product to the United States and do not intend to do so in the future. On September 18, 2000, respondents, Wolfcraft GMbH of Germany and Wolfcraft, Inc. of Itasca, Illinois, filed an opposition to complainants' motion stating that they in fact intend to resume importation of the product in question to the United States. On September 18, 2000, the Commission investigative attorney (IA) filed a response in support of the motion, but argued that it should be construed as a motion for partial termination based on the withdrawal of certain allegations. On September 20, 2000, complainants filed a reply agreeing with IA's suggestion that their motion be construed as one for partial termination. On October 2, 2000, the presiding ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 5) granting complainants' motion for partial withdrawal of the complaint. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 210.42(h)(3), 19 CFR 210.42(h)(3). Copies of the public version of the ID, and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation, are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (). Issued: November 3, 2000. By order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-28981 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.