Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-11-06 · United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule; correction

450 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/11/06/00-28315

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Part 1 RIN 0651-AB05 Changes To Implement Eighteen-Month Publication of Patent Applications; Correction AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) published a final rule in the **Federal Register** of September 20, 2000, revising the rules of practice in patent cases to implement the eighteen-month publication provisions of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999.
This document corrects two errors in that final rule. EFFECTIVE DATE: November 29, 2000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: *Concerning this rule:* Robert W. Bahr by telephone at
(703)308-6906, or by mail addressed to: Box Comments—Patents, Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington, D.C. 20231, or by facsimile to
(703)872-9411, marked to the attention of Robert W. Bahr. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office published a final rule in the **Federal Register** of September 20, 2000 (65 FR 57023), entitled “Changes to Implement Eighteen-Month Publication of Patent Applications.” This document corrects errors in § 1.55 and § 1.99 as discussed below. Section 1.55(a) should refer to “35 U.S.C. 119(a) through
(d)and (f), 172, and 365(a) and (b)” rather than “35 U.S.C. 119(a) through (d), 172, and 365(a)” (references to 35 U.S.C. 119(f) and 365(b) were inadvertently omitted). Section 1.55(c) should refer to “35 U.S.C. 119(a) through
(d)and (f), and 365(a)” rather than “35 U.S.C. 119(a) through
(d)and 365(a)” (a reference to 35 U.S.C. 119(f) was inadvertently omitted). Section 1.99(f) should not include its last sentence (“[N]o further submission on behalf of the member of the public will be considered, unless such submission raises new issues which could not have been earlier presented.”). In rule FR Doc. 00-23822, published on September 20, 2000 (65 FR 57023), make the following corrections: § 1.55 [Corrected] 1. On page 57053, in the third column, in § 1.55, in paragraph
(a)introductory text, in lines 5 and 6, correct “119(a) through (d), 172, and 365(a)” to read “119(a) through
(d)and (f), 172, and 365(a) and (b);” and on page 57054, in the first column, in § 1.55, in paragraph
(c)introductory text, in each of lines 4, 9, and 19, correct “119(a)-(d) or 365(a)” to read “119(a) through
(d)and (f), or 365(a)”. § 1.99 [Corrected] 2. On page 57056, in the second column, in § 1.99, in paragraph (f), in lines 14 through 19, remove the sentence “No further submission on behalf of the member of the public will be considered, unless such submission raises new issues which could not have been earlier presented.” Dated: October 30, 2000. Albin F. Drost, Acting General Counsel. [FR Doc. 00-28315 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 37 CFR 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule; correction
Cite37 CFR 1
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.