Proposed Rules. Proposed rule
/register/2000/11/03/00-27660·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-27660 · CA 241-0244b; FRL-6893-2 · 40 CFR 52
Summary
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD). The revisions concern the recission and associated negative declarations for one volatile organic compound source category and one oxides of nitrogen source category for the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD). The intended effect of this action is to bring the AVAPCD SIP up to date in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). EPA is finalizing the approval of these recissions and associated negative declarations from the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards and plan requirements for nonattainment areas. EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.
Dates
Comments must arrive by December 4, 2000.
Supplementary Information
The rules being approved for recission and the negative declarations being approved for the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) portion of the California SIP are listed in the following Table: Submitted Recissions and Negative Declarations Rule No. and title Adoption date Submittal date Type of revision 1103, Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetic Manufacturing Operations 01-18-00 03-28-00 Recission and Negative Declaration. 1159, Nitric Acid Units—Oxides of Nitrogen 01-18-00 03-28-00 Recission and Negative Declaration. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register , the EPA is approving the state's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for this approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: October 4, 2000. Felicia Marcus, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 00-27660 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
- 40 CFR 52