Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-11-02 · Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

572 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/11/02/00-27983·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 00-27983 · Docket No. FR-4561-N-72

Summary

The proposed information collection requirement described below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal.

Dates

Comments Due Date: December 4, 2000.

Supplementary Information

The Department has submitted the proposal for the collection of information, as described below, to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). The Notice lists the following information: (1) the title or the information collection proposal, (2) the office of the agency to collect the information; (3) the OMB approval number, if applicable; (4) the description of the need for the information and its proposed use; (5) the agency form number, if applicable; (6) what members of the public will be affected by the proposal; (7) how frequently information submissions will be required; (8) an estimate of the total number of hours needed to prepare the information submission including number of respondents, frequency of response, and hours of response; (9) whether the proposal is new, an extension, reinstatement, or revision of an information collection requirement; and (10) the name and telephone number of an agency official familiar with the proposal and of the OMB Desk Officer for the Department. This Notice also lists the following information: Title of Proposal: HOPE VI Survey. OMB Approval Number: 2577-. Form Numbers: None. Description of the need for the information and its proposed use: One hundred original HOPE VI residents at each of eight sites will be surveyed by telephone using computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). The residents will be asked to provide information on housing choices available to and made by original residents, satisfaction with current housing neighborhood locations, current living conditions, attitudes toward services received through the HOPE VI Program, and current employment status. The information will help HUD increase knowledge of the ways in which housing choices and social and economic outcomes for original residents are affected by revitalization efforts at selected HOPE VI sites. Form the information collected, HUD and local housing agencies will learn more of how HOPE VI effects original participating families. An incentive payment of $20.00 will be made to respondents. Frequency of Submission: One-time. Reporting Burden: Number of respondents x Frequency of response x Hours per response = Burden hours 800 1 0.33 264 Total Estimated Burden Hours: 264. Status: New Request. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as amended. Dated: October 25, 2000. Wayne Eddins, Departmental Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 00-27983 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 44 USC 35
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Cite44 USC 35
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.