Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-10-19 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

516 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/10/19/00-26614·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-26614 · CT058-7217b; A-1-FRL-6886-6 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

The EPA is proposing to approve a number of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Connecticut (CT). The revisions consist of changes to various volatile organic compound (VOC) regulations that are currently in the CT SIP. These changes include: revisions to the definition of VOC; revisions to the gasoline loading regulation; revisions to the metal cleaning regulation; revisions to the miscellaneous metal parts and products coating regulation; and revisions to CT's reasonably available control technology for VOC regulation. In addition, EPA is proposing to approve CT's negative declarations for the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry distillation and reactor vessel source categories for which EPA issued control technique guideline documents (CTGs). In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register , EPA is approving: revisions to the definition of VOC; revisions to the gasoline loading regulation; revisions to the metal cleaning regulation; revisions to the miscellaneous metal parts and products coating regulation; and revisions to CT's reasonably available control technology for VOC regulation. EPA is processing these SIP revisions as direct final rules without prior proposal because the Agency views these as noncontroversial submittals and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

Dates

Written comments must be received on or before November 20, 2000.

Supplementary Information

For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register . Dated: October 6, 2000. Mindy S. Lubber, Regional Administrator, EPA-New England. [FR Doc. 00-26614 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.