Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-10-18 · Coast Guard, DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Clarification to final rule

368 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/10/18/00-26766·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Coast Guard, DOT
Action: Clarification to final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-26766 · RIN 2115-AF79 · USCG-1999-5149 · 33 CFR 154

Summary

This document clarifies a preamble discussion to a final rule published in the Federal Register of June 30, 2000. The rule amended Coast Guard regulations requiring response plans for marine transportation-related (MTR) facilities that handle, store, or transport animal fats or vegetable oils. Specifically, this document clarifies the explanation for higher volume ports.

Dates

This document becomes effective on October 18, 2000.

Supplementary Information

Clarification of Preamble to Final Rule On June 30, 2000, we published in the Federal Register the final rule titled “Response Plans for Marine Transportation-Related Facilities Handling Non-Petroleum Oils” (USCG-1999-5149)[65 FR 40820]. In the preamble to that rule, on page 40822, we stated that higher volume port areas were designated based on the availability of response equipment on hand in those ports. After that publication, the Coast Guard received comments from the affected public requesting clarification of our high volume ports discussion. We previously addressed this topic in an interim final rule, “Response Plans for Marine Transportation-Related Facilities” (58 FR 7330), that was published in the Federal Register on February 5, 1993. As stated in the interim rule, higher volume ports were actually designated based on the volume of all types of oil transported through those ports. Faster response times were established for those ports to encourage vessel and facility plan holders to concentrate larger quantities of response equipment as close as possible to locations having the highest probability of a significant spill incident. Over time, the industry has responded by stockpiling larger quantities of response equipment in those ports practicable for all plan holders regardless of the type of oil cargo carried. Dated: October 12, 2000. Howard L. Hime, Acting Director of Standards, Marine Safety and Environmental Protection. [FR Doc. 00-26766 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 33 CFR 154
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Clarification to final rule
Cite33 CFR 154
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.