Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-10-18 · U.S. International Trade Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

392 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/10/18/00-26747·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-334] Certain Condensers, Parts Thereof and Products Containing Same, Including Air Conditioners for Automobiles; Notice of Rescission of Limited Exclusion Order AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has rescinded the limited exclusion order previously issued in the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnette Rimmer, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-0663. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The authority for the Commission's action is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.76 of the Commission's rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.76). On August 20, 1997, the Commission issued a limited exclusion order in the investigation based upon a finding that respondents Showa Aluminum Corporation and Showa Aluminum Corporation of America (collectively “Showa”) had violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), by importing certain condensers that infringed claims 9 and 10 of U.S. Letters Patent assigned to Modine. On September 7, 2000, Showa and complainant Modine Manufacturing Company (“Modine”) filed a joint petition to rescind the remedial order under Commission rule 210.76 on the basis of a settlement agreement they had reached. Showa and Modine asserted that their settlement agreement constituted “changed conditions of fact or law” sufficient to justify recission of the order under Commission rule 210.76(a), 19 CFR 210.76(a). Having reviewed the parties' submissions, the Commission determined that the petition and settlement agreement satisfy the requirements of rule 210.76(a). The Commission therefore issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order previously issued in the investigation. Copies of the Commission's order and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) In the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E. Street, SW., DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-2000. Public documents are available for downloading from the Commission's internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). Hearing impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal at
(202)205-1810. Issued: October 10, 2000. By Order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-26747 Filed 10-17-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.