Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-10-16 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice

803 words·~4 min read·/register/2000/10/16/00-26505·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 00-26505 · FRL-6885-9; MM-HQ-2000-0006

Summary

EPA has entered into a consent agreement with AirTouch Communications, Inc. to resolve violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), and its implementing regulations. AirTouch failed to prepare Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (“SPCC”) plans for ten facilities where they stored diesel oil in above ground tanks. EPA, as authorized by CWA section 311(b)(6), 33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(6), has assessed a civil penalty for these violations. The Administrator, as required by CWA section 311(b)(6)(C), 33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(6)(C), is hereby providing public notice of, and an opportunity for interested persons to comment on, this consent agreement and proposed final order.

Dates

Comments are due on or before November 15, 2000.

Supplementary Information

Electronic Copies: Electronic copies of this document are available from the EPA Home Page under the link “Laws and Regulations” at the Federal Register —Environmental Documents entry (). I. Background AirTouch Communications, Inc., a telecommunications company incorporated in the State of Delaware and located at One California Street, San Francisco, California 94111 failed to prepare SPCC plans for ten facilities. AirTouch Communications, Inc. disclosed, pursuant to the EPA “Incentives for Self-Policing: Discovery, Disclosures, Correction and Prevention of Violations” (“Audit Policy”), 60 FR 66,706 (December 22, 1995), that they failed to prepare SPCC plans for ten facilities where they stored diesel oil in above ground storage tanks, in violation of the CWA section 311(b)(3) and 40 CFR part 112. EPA determined that AirTouch met the criteria set out in the Audit Policy for a 100% waiver of the gravity component of the penalty. As a result, EPA waived the gravity based penalty ($47,625.00) and proposed a settlement penalty amount of fifty-two thousand, six hundred and thirty-six dollars ($52,636.00). This is the amount of the economic benefit gained by AirTouch, attributable to their delayed compliance with the SPCC regulations. AirTouch Communications, Inc. has agreed to pay this amount in civil penalties. EPA and AirTouch negotiated and signed an administrative consent agreement, following the Consolidated Rules of Procedure, 40 CFR 22.13, on September 28, 2000 ( In Re: AirTouch Communications, Inc., Docket No. MM-HQ-2000-0006). This consent agreement is subject to public notice and comment under CWA section 311(b)(6), 33 U.S.C. section 1321(b)(6). Under CWA section 311(b)(6)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1321 (b)(6)(A), any owner, operator, or person in charge of a vessel, onshore facility, or offshore facility from which oil is discharged in violation of the CWA section 311 (b)(3), 33 U.S.C. 1321 (b)(3), or who fails or refuses to comply with any regulations that have been issued under CWA section 311 (j), 33 U.S.C. 1321(j), may be assessed an administrative civil penalty of up to $137,500 by EPA. Class II proceedings under CWA section 311(b)(6) are conducted in accordance with 40 CFR part 22. The procedures by which the public may comment on a proposed Class II penalty order, or participate in a Clean Water Act Class II penalty proceeding, are set forth in 40 CFR 22.45. The deadline for submitting public comment on this proposed final order is November 15, 2000. All comments will be transferred to the Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) of EPA for consideration. The powers and duties of the EAB are outlined in 40 CFR 22.04(a). Pursuant to CWA section 311(b)(6)(C), EPA will not issue an order in this proceeding prior to the close of the public comment period. List of Subjects Environmental protection. Dated: October 3, 2000. David A. Nielsen, Director, Multimedia Enforcement Division, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. [FR Doc. 00-26505 Filed 10-13-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 3
3 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 112
  • 40 CFR 22
  • 40 CFR 22.04(a)
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice
Cite40 CFR 112
Cite40 CFR 22
Cite40 CFR 22.04(a)
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.