Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-10-12 · Office of Hearings and Appeals, Interior · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; extension of comment period

467 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/10/12/00-26100·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of Hearings and Appeals, Interior
Action: Proposed rule; extension of comment period
Citation: FR Doc. 00-26100 · RIN 1090-AA74 · 43 CFR 4

Summary

This action extends the comment period an additional 30 days on the Department of the Interior's Office of Hearings and Appeals' proposal to amend its rules governing who may receive an award of costs and expenses, including attorney fees, under section 525(e) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The proposed amendment provides that an applicant for a permit may only receive an award from the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), if OSM denies an application in bad faith and for the purpose of harassing or embarrassing the applicant. EFFECTIVE DATE: Comments are due to the agency by November 13, 2000.

Supplementary Information

On July 28, 2000, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) published a proposed rule (65 FR 46389) amending 43 CFR 4.1294(b) and (c) to provide than an applicant for a permit from OSM is entitled to an award of costs and expenses from OSM only when circumstances demonstrate that OSM denied an application in bad faith and for the purpose of harassing or embarrassing the applicant. In a letter to the Director of OHA, dated August 15, 2000, the National Mining Association (NMA) requested a 45 day extension of the comment period for this proposed amendment because the existing comment period did not allow adequate opportunity to comment fully. The NMA also requested records related to the proposed amendment under the Freedom of Information Act. The FOIA response letter was issued on September 12, 2000. The Director of OHA has determined that an extension of time to obtain the comments on the proposed rule is warranted and, therefore, a 30 day extension is granted. This notice announces that 30 day extension of the comment period. Dated: October 4, 2000. John Berry, Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget. [FR Doc. 00-26100 Filed 10-11-00; 8:45 am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 43 CFR 4
  • 43 CFR 4.1294(b)
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; extension of comment period
Cite43 CFR 4
Cite43 CFR 4.1294(b)
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.