Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-09-27 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of intent to rule on application

658 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/09/27/00-24740·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT
Action: Notice of intent to rule on application
Citation: FR Doc. 00-24740

Summary

The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application to impose a PFC at General Mitchell International Airport and to use the revenue at General Mitchell International Airport and Lawrence J. Timmerman under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law 101-508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

Dates

Comments must be received on or before October 27, 2000.

Supplementary Information

The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application to impose a PFC at General Mitchell International Airport and to use the revenue at General Mitchell International Airport and Lawrence J. Timmerman under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law 101-508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). On September 6, 2000 the FAA determined that the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC submitted by Milwaukee County was substantially complete within the requirements of section 158.25 of Part 158. The FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or in part, no later than December 5, 2000. The following is a brief overview of the application. PFC application number: 06-00-C-00-MKE. Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00. Proposed charge effective date: June 1, 2004. Proposed charge expiration date: July 1, 2006. Total estimated PFC revenue: $22,667,375.00. Brief description of proposed projects: Impose and Use General Mitchell Rehabilitate taxiway A and A3, reconstruct perimeter road, rehabilitate runway 7R/25L, C concourse stem and 6 gate expansion (design), acquire flight information display and paging system, master plan update, terminal apron joint repair, seal coating runway 71/25R and runway 13/31, conduct electrical master plan study, rehabilitate taxiway B from R to G, construct abrasive storage building, upgrade security system, install runway 1L/19R centerline and touchdown zone lighting, C concourse taxiway expansion, baggage claim remodeling (design), rehabilitate taxiway M at B, construct maintenance storage building, construct hush house noise suppressor structure (design). Impose and Use Lawrence J. Timmerman: payment rehabilitation. Impose Only General Mitchell: C concourse stem and 6 gate expansion (construction). Class or classes of air carriers which the public agency has requested not be required to collect PFCs: Air taxi/commercial operators filing FAA from 1800-31. Any person may inspect the application in person at the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, notice and other documents germane to the application in person at Milwaukee County. Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois, on September 14, 2000. Benito De Leon, Manager, Planning and Programing Branch, Airports Division, Great Lakes Region. [FR Doc. 00-24740 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45am]

Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 101-508
  • 14 CFR 158
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of intent to rule on application
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101-508
Cite14 CFR 158
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.