Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-09-07 · National Park Service, Interior · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Technical corrections

544 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/09/07/00-22859·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Park Service, Interior
Action: Technical corrections
Citation: FR Doc. 00-22859 · RIN 1024-AC72 · 36 CFR 51

Summary

This action makes technical corrections to regulations concerning the determination of a preferred offeror to correct a typographical error and to delete confusing and unnecessary provisions. EFFECTIVE DATE: September 7, 2000.

Supplementary Information

The National Park Service published in final in the Federal Register on April 17, 2000 (65 FR 20630), an amendment to 36 CFR part 51 to reflect the changes in policies and procedures applicable to National Park Service concession contracts resulting from the passage of Title IV of the National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-391). Section 51.40(c) has been determined by the National Park Service to be confusing and unnecessary in light of the entirety of § 51.40. Specifically, § 51.40(c) has been misunderstood to suggest that in order for a portion of a park area to be determined “backcountry” for purposes of 36 CFR part 51, the area must be inaccessible by motorized vehicle. This is not the meaning of § 51.40. Rather, the section is intended to mean that the accessibility of a portion of a park area to motorized vehicles is only one consideration that may be taken into account in determining the existence of “backcountry” for purposes of determining which concession contracts are outfitter and guide contracts under 36 CFR part 51. As stated in § 51.40, determinations as to whether outfitter and guide operations are conducted in the backcountry of a park area are made on a park-by-park basis, taking into account the park area's particular geographic circumstances. Accessibility of an area by motorized vehicles is only a possible consideration in this determination. In order to correct the confusion caused by § 51.40(c), the National Park Service has determined to delete 36 CFR 51.40(c) as confusing and unnecessary. The overall intentions of § 51.40 remain the same with the deletion of § 51.40(c), as § 51.40(a) continues to provide that remoteness from roads and developed areas is a possible factor in determining “backcountry” for purposes of 36 CFR part 51. In addition, § 51.46 of the final regulation contains a typographical error, the inadvertent inclusion of the date “May 17, 2000,” in its text. List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 51 Concessions, Government contracts, National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Accordingly, 36 CFR part 51 is corrected by making the following correcting amendments: PART 51—CONCESSION CONTRACTS 1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows: Authority: The Act of August 25, 1916, as amended and supplemented, 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq., particularly, 16 U.S.C. 3 and Title IV of the National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-391). § 51.40 [Amended] 2. In § 51.40, paragraph (c) is removed. 3. In § 51.40, paragraphs (d) and (e) are redesignated as paragraphs (c) and (d). 4. In § 51.46, the last sentence is corrected by removing the date “May 17, 2000”. Dated: August 30, 2000. Cynthia Orlando, Acting Associate Director, Park Operations and Education. [FR Doc. 00-22859 Filed 9-6-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • 36 CFR 51
  • Pub. L. 105-391
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Technical corrections
Cite36 CFR 51
Pub. L.Pub. L. 105-391
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.