Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-09-06 · National Reconnaissance Office, DOD · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

450 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/09/06/00-22699·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Reconnaissance Office, DOD
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-22699 · 32 CFR 326

Summary

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is proposing to add a new responsibility for NRO employees under the NRO Privacy Act Program. NRO employees are now required to participate in specialized Privacy Act training should their duties require dealing with special investigators, the news media, or the public. This amendment is triggered by a change made to the Department of Defense Privacy Program (32 CFR part 310) on August 7, 2000, at 65 FR 48169.

Dates

Comments must be received by November 6, 2000 to be considered by the agency.

Supplementary Information

Executive Order 12866, ‘Regulatory Planning and Review’ It has been determined that 32 CFR part 321 is not a significant regulatory action. The rule does not: (1) Have an annual effect to the economy of $100 million or more; or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a section of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order. Public Law 96-354, ‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’ (5 U.S.C. 601) It has been certified that this rule is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Public Law 96-511, ‘Paperwork Reduction Act’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) It has been certified that this part does not impose any reporting or record keeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 326 Privacy. 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 326 continues to read as follows: Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). 2. Section 326.5, is to be amended by adding paragraph (j)(11) to read follows: § 326.5 Responsibilities. (j) Employees, NRO: (11) Will participate in specialized Privacy Act training should their duties require dealing with special investigators, the news media, or the public. Dated: August 30, 2000. L.M. Bynum, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 00-22699 Filed 9-5-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 3
7 references not yet in our index
  • 32 CFR 326
  • 32 CFR 310
  • 32 CFR 321
  • Pub. L. 96-354
  • Pub. L. 96-511
  • Pub. L. 93-579
  • 88 Stat. 1896
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite32 CFR 326
Cite32 CFR 310
Cite32 CFR 321
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-354
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-511
Cites 10 · showing 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.