Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-09-05 · Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Termination of proceeding

659 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/09/05/00-22577·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA
Action: Termination of proceeding
Citation: FR Doc. 00-22577 · Docket No. FV96-983-1PR; AO F&V-983-1 · 7 CFR 983

Summary

This action terminates the proceeding to establish a marketing agreement and order for pistachios grown in California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. At the request of the pistachio industry, the Agricultural Marketing Service held a public hearing in August 1996 to receive evidence on a program proposed by the California Pistachio Commission and the Western Pistachio Association. The program would have authorized quality and container requirements and mandatory inspection. Subsequent to the hearing, the proponent industry groups requested that the proceeding be terminated. Given the lack of support for the proposal currently under consideration, the Department is terminating the proceeding.

Dates

The action is terminated as of September 6, 2000.

Supplementary Information

Prior document in this proceeding: Notice of hearing issued on July 26, 1996, and published in the Federal Register on July 31, 1996 (61 FR 39911). This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557 of title 5 of the United States Code and therefore is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order 12866. This action is issued pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR part 900). Preliminary Statement In January 1996, the California Pistachio Commission (CPC) and the Western Pistachio Association (WPA), representing the U.S. pistachio industry, requested that the Department hold a public hearing to consider a proposed marketing agreement and order for pistachios grown in California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. The proposed program would have authorized quality and container requirements and mandatory inspection. A notice of hearing was published in the Federal Register on July 31, 1996. The hearing was held in Fresno, California, August 20 through 23, 1996. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge fixed October 31, 1996, as the date for interested parties to file post-hearing briefs. Three briefs were received, all in opposition to the proposed order. Based on a review of hearing evidence and post-hearing briefs, on April 9, 1997, the Department announced its plans to reopen the hearing to take additional evidence relating to the economic and marketing conditions that justified the need for a pistachio marketing order as well as the economic impact of the proposed order on the industry. We asked for public input on scheduling the hearing by May 9, 1997. On July 22, 1997, the Department extended to September 1, 1997, the period during which it would accept public comment on reopening the hearing. On October 3, 1997, we further extended the comment period until January 31, 1998. No comments were received during the period provided. On June 22, 2000, the CPC and WPA requested that the proceeding be terminated. Termination of Proceeding In view of the above, the proceeding is hereby terminated. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983 Marketing agreements, Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. Dated: August 28, 2000. Kathleen A. Merrigan, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 00-22577 Filed 9-1-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
3 references not yet in our index
  • 7 CFR 983
  • 7 USC 601-674
  • 7 CFR 900
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Termination of proceeding
Cite7 CFR 983
Cite7 USC 601-674
Cite7 CFR 900
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.