Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-08-30 · INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

406 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/08/30/00-22195

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7026-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigations Nos. 731-TA-96 and 439-445 (Review)] Industrial Nitrocellulose From Brazil, China, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, the United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on industrial nitrocellulose from Brazil, 2 China, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, 3 and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
The Commission further determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on industrial nitrocellulose from Yugoslavia would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's rules of practice and procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Thelma J. Askey dissenting. 3 Commissioner Thelma J. Askey dissenting. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 1999 (64 FR 29344) and determined on September 3, 1999 that it would conduct full reviews (64 FR 50107, September 15, 1999).
Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the **Federal Register** on October 25, 1999 (64 FR 57483). 4 The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on June 8, 2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. 4 The Commission subsequently revised its schedule, publishing its notice in the **Federal Register** on February 7, 2000 (65 FR 5889).
The Commission later revised the schedule again, publishing the second revised notice on June 26, 2000 (65 FR 39426). The Commission transmitted its determinations in these investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on August 24, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3342 (August 2000), entitled Industrial Nitrocellulose from Brazil, China, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, the United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia: Investigations Nos. 731-TA-96 and 439-445 (Review).
Issued: August 24, 2000. By order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-22195 Filed 8-29-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.