Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-08-29 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Interpretive rule

206 words·~1 min read·/register/2000/08/29/00-22037·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT
Action: Interpretive rule
Citation: FR Doc. 00-22037 · 14 CFR 47

Summary

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) interprets the phase “court of competent jurisdiction” as used in Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations § 47.37 as meaning a court of the country where the aircraft was last registered. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 29, 2000.

Supplementary Information

Section 37.37(b)(2) of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR Part 47) requires an applicant for United States registration of an aircraft to provide evidence satisfactory to the Administrator that foreign registration of the aircraft has terminated. Satisfactory evidence included “a final judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction that determines, under the law of the country concerned, that the registration has in fact become invalid.” (14 CFR 47.37(b)(2)) FAA interprets the phrase “court of competent jurisdiction” to mean a court of the country where the aircraft was last registered. Issued in Oklahoma City, OK on August 22, 2000. Joseph R. Standell, Aeronautical Center Counsel. [FR Doc. 00-22037 Filed 8-28-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 47
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Interpretive rule
Cite14 CFR 47
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.