Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-08-21 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; correction

457 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/08/21/00-20947

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-U DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 139 [Docket No. FAA-2000-7479; Notice No. 00-05] RIN 2120-AG96 Certification of Airports; Correction AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document makes corrections to the proposed rule published in the **Federal Register** on June 21, 2000 (65 FR 38639), which proposes to revise the current airport certification regulation and to establish certification requirements for airports serving scheduled air carrier operations in aircraft with 10-30 seats.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Bruce, 202-267-8553, or E-mail: linda.bruce@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction In proposed rule FR Doc. 00-14524, published on June 21, 2000 (65 FR 38636), make the following corrections: 1. On page 38654, in the second column, fifth full paragraph, line one, correct “Similar to proposed § 139.317(1)” to read “Similar to proposed § 139.317(k).” 2. On page 38673, in the second column, correct § 139.111 by revising paragraphs (s),(b), and
(c)to read as follows: § 139.111 Exemptions.
(a)An applicant or a certificate holder may petition the Administrator under 14 CFR 11, General Rulemaking Procedures, of this chapter for an exemption from any requirement of this part.
(b)Under 49 U.S.C. 44706(c), the Administrator may exempt an applicant or a certificate holder that enplanes annually less than one-quarter of 1 percent of the total number of passengers enplaned at all air carrier airports from all, or part, of the aircraft rescue and firefighting equipment requirements of this part, on the grounds that compliance with those requirements is, or would be, unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical. An applicant for, or holder of, an airport operating certificate filing for such an exemption shall use the format prescribed under § 139.321.
(c)Each petition filed under section must be submitted in duplicate to the—
(1)Regional Airports Division Manager; and
(2)U.S. Department of Transportation's Docket Management System, per 14 CFR 11. 3. On page 38677, in the first and second columns correct § 139.137 by removing paragraph (f); and by redesignating paragraphs
(g)through
(1)as
(f)through (k); and by revising newly designated paragraph (f)(3) to read as follows: § 139.317 Aircraft rescue and firefighting: Equipment and agents.
(f)* * *
(3)Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph
(f)of this section, any certificate holder whose aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles are not equipped with turrets or do not have the discharge capacity required in this section, but otherwise met the requirements of this part on December 31, 1987, need not comply with paragraph
(f)of this section for a particular vehicle until that vehicle is replaced or rehabilitated. Issued in Washington, DC on August 14, 2000. Donald P. Byrne, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. [FR Doc. 00-20947 Filed 8-18-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 139
  • 14 CFR 11
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; correction
Cite14 CFR 139
Cite14 CFR 11
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.