Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-08-14 · Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); Labor · Notices

Notices. Notice of an opportunity for public comment

740 words·~3 min read·/register/2000/08/14/00-20546·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-10-M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. ICR-1218-0216(2000)] Manufacturer's Certification of Modifications Made to Construction Aerial Lifts; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB)Approval of Information-Collection (Paperwork) Requirements AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); Labor. ACTION: Notice of an opportunity for public comment. SUMMARY: OSHA solicits comments concerning the proposed reduction in the burden hours and extension of the information-collection requirements contained in the Aerial Lifts Standard (29 CFR 1926.453(a)(2)). Request for Comment The Agency has a particular interest in comments on the following issues: • Whether the information-collection requirements are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions, including whether the information is useful; • The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden (time and costs) of the information-collection requirements, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • The quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and • Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply; for example, by using automated or other technological information-collection and transmission techniques. DATES: Submit written comments on or before October 13, 2000. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Dock Office, Docket No. ICR-12218-0216(2000), Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:
(202)693-2350. Commenters may transmit written comments of 10 pages or less in length by facsimile to
(202)693-1648. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen M. Martinez, Directorate of Policy, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3641, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:
(202)693-2444. A copy of the Agency's Information-Collection Request
(ICR)supporting the need for the information-collection requirements in the Aerial Lifts Standard is available for inspection and copying in the Docket Office, or you may request a mailed copy by telephoning Kathleen M. Martinez at
(202)694-2444. For electronic copies of the ICR on the Aerial Lifts Standard, contact OSHA on the Internet at http://www.osha.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with the opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information-collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA-95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of the information burden is correct. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of the 1970 (the Act) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of the Act or for developing information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The only information-collection requirement in the Aerial Lifts Standard is a certification provision, paragraph (a)(2). This provision requires an employer who modifies an aerial lift for uses not documented by the lift manufacturer to obtain from that manufacturer, or an equivalent entity (such as nationally-recognized laboratory), a written certificate stating that: The modification conforms to the applicable provisions of ANSI A92.2-1969 and the Aerial Lifts Standard; and the modified aerial lift is at least as safe as it was before modification. II. Proposed Action OSHA proposes to reduce the burden hours and extend the collection-of-information (paperwork) requirement in the Aerial Lifts Standard. Regarding the reduced paperwork requirement, the Agency decreased the estimated amount of time for maintaining and disclosing the certification record from 5 minutes to 3 minutes. After obtaining comments to this proposal, OSHA will summarize the comments and will include this summary in its request to OMB to extend the approval of the information-collection requirement in the Aerial Lifts Standard. *Type of Review:* Extension of currently approved information-collection requirements. *Title:* Aerial Lifts (29 CFR 1926.453(a)(2)). *OMB Number:* 1218-0216. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit; Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal governments. *Number of Respondents:* 60. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Average Time Per Response:* 3 minutes. *Total Burden Hours:* 3 hours. III. Authority and Signature Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 6-96 (62 FR 11). Signed at Washington, DC on August 4, 2000. Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor. [FR Doc. 00-20546 Filed 8-11-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of an opportunity for public comment
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.