Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-08-14 · U.S. International Trade Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

462 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/08/14/00-20528·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7020-02-U INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-431] Certain Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices, Microprocessors, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's (“ALJ's”) initial determination (“ID”) terminating the investigation in its entirety by granting
(1)the joint motion of complainant Rambus Inc. and respondents Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi Semiconductor (America), Inc. to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement, and by granting
(2)complainant's motion to withdraw its complaint and terminate the investigation as to the remaining respondents. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clara Kuehn, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-3012. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission ordered the institution of this investigation on April 18, 2000, based on a complaint filed by Rambus Inc. of Mountain View, California. The notice of investigation was published in the **Federal Register** on April 24, 2000. 65 *Fed. Reg.* 21790 (2000). The complaint named four respondents: Hitachi, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; Hitachi Semiconductor (America), Inc., of San Jose, California (collectively, “Hitachi”); Sega Enterprises, Ltd., of Tokyo, Japan; and Sega of America, Inc., of San Francisco, California (collectively, “Sega”). On June 29, 2000, complainant Rambus and the Hitachi respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation by settlement. Also on June 29, 2000, complainant Rambus filed a motion to withdraw the complaint and terminate the investigation as to the Sega respondents. On July 10, 2000, the Commission investigation attorney filed responses in support of each motion. The Sega respondents filed no response to either motion. On July 12, 2000, the presiding ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 11) granting both motions. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 210.42). Copies of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Issued: August 7, 2000. By order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-20528 Filed 8-11-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.