Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-08-01 · Department of State · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. 60-Day Notice of proposed information collection; election observer questionnaire

354 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/08/01/00-19364·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Department of State
Action: 60-Day Notice of proposed information collection; election observer questionnaire
Citation: FR Doc. 00-19364 · Public Notice 3376

Summary

The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The following summarizes the information collection proposal submitted to OMB: Type of Request: Data Collection from Election Observers Originating Office: Bureau of European Affairs, Office of European Security and Political Affairs (EUR/RPM) Title of Information Collection: Election Observer Questionnaire. Frequency: Occasionally, linked to elections in certain OSCE Participating States. Form Number: None. Respondents: U.S. citizens selected and funded by the U.S. Department of State to serve as election observers as part of OSCE Election Observation Missions. Estimated Number of Respondents: 100 per year. Average Hours Per Response: 10 minutes per response. Total Estimated Burden: 1000 minutes = 16 hrs 40 minutes. Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to: • Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency. • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used. • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected. • Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of technology.

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.