Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-07-27 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; extension of comment period

297 words·~1 min read·/register/2000/07/27/00-19013

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [CA 019-FOI; FRL-6841-9] Clean Air Act Reclassification and Finding of Failure To Implement a State Implementation Plan; California, San Joaquin Valley Nonattainment Area; Ozone; Extension of Comment Period AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period. SUMMARY: EPA is extending the comment period for its proposed action to find that the San Joaquin Valley serious ozone nonattainment area, which includes eastern Kern County, did not attain the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard by November 15, 1999, the Clean Air Act's
(CAA)attainment deadline for serious ozone nonattainment areas. If EPA makes final this proposed finding, the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment area will be reclassified by operation of law to severe. DATES: Comments must arrive by August 28, 2000. ADDRESSES: Mail comments to John Ungvarsky, Air Planning Office (Air-2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 or email comments to ungvarsky.john@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Ungvarsky, Air Planning Office (Air-2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,
(415)744-1286. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 19, 2000, we proposed that the San Joaquin Valley serious ozone nonattainment area did not attain the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard and that the approved serious area ozone State Implementation Plan for the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment area has not been fully implemented. The proposal provided a 30 day public comment period that ended on July 19, 2000. In response to a request from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and the Kern County Air Pollution Control District, we are extending the comment period for an additional 30 days. Dated: July 19, 2000. Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 00-19013 Filed 7-26-00; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; extension of comment period
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.