Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-07-12 · INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

194 words·~1 min read·/register/2000/07/12/00-17627·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731-TA-718 (Review)] Glycine From China Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on glycine from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
Background The Commission instituted this review on February 3, 2000 (65 FR 5371, February 3, 2000) and determined on May 5, 2000 that it would conduct an expedited review (65 FR 31145, May 16, 2000). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on June 30, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3315 (June 2000), entitled Glycine From China: Investigation No. 731-TA-718 (Review). Issued: July 3, 2000. By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-17627 Filed 7-11-00; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.