Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-07-07 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of final results of five-year (“Sunset”) review: Revocation of antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Russia

502 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/07/07/00-17249·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration April 2000 Sunset Reviews: Final Results and Revocation AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of final results of five-year (“Sunset”) review: Revocation of antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Russia. SUMMARY: On April 3, 2000, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Russia (65 FR 17484) pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”).
Because no domestic party responded to the sunset review notice of initiation by the applicable deadline, the Department is revoking this order. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 7, 2000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha V. Douthit or James P. Maeder, Office of Policy, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202)482-5050 or
(202)482-3330, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 12, 1995, the Department issued the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Russia (60 FR 25691) pursuant to section 736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”). The Department initiated a sunset review of this order by publishing a notice of the initiation in the **Federal Register** , April 3, 2000 (65 FR 17484). In addition, as a courtesy to interested parties, the Department sent letters, via certified and registered mail, to each party listed on the Department's most current service list for this proceeding to inform them of the automatic initiation of the sunset review on this order. No domestic interested parties responded to the notice of initiation by the April 18, 2000 deadline ( *see* section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of *Procedures for Conducting Five-year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders* , 63 FR 13520 (March 20, 1998) (“ *Sunset Regulations* ”)). Determination To Revoke Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and section 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3) of the *Sunset Regulations* , if no domestic interested party responds to the notice of initiation, the Department shall issue a final determination, within 90 days after the initiation of the review, revoking the order. Because no domestic interested party responded to the notice of initiation by the applicable deadline, April 18, 2000, we are revoking this antidumping duty order. Effective Date of Revocation Pursuant to section 751(c)(6)(A)(iv) of the Act, the Department will instruct the United States Customs Service to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the merchandise subject to this order entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, on or after January 1, 2000. Entries of subject merchandise prior to the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to suspension of liquidation and antidumping duty deposit requirements. The Department will complete any pending administrative reviews of this order and will conduct administrative reviews of subject merchandise entered prior to the effective date of revocation in response to appropriately filed requests for review. Dated: June 30, 2000. Troy H. Cribb, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 00-17249 Filed 7-06-00; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.