Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-07-06 · Federal Communications Commission · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

424 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/07/06/00-17047

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [DA-1419, MM Docket No. 00-119, RM-9879] Digital Television Broadcast Service; Hazleton, PA AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by WOLF License Corporation, licensee of Station WOLF-TV, NTSC Channel 56, Hazleton, Pennsylvania, requesting the substitution of DTV Channel 45 for its assigned DTV Channel 9. DTV Channel 45 can be allotted to Hazleton, Pennsylvania, in compliance with the principle community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates (41-11-00 N. and 75-52-10 W.).
However, since the community of Hazleton is located within 400 kilometers of the U.S.-Canadian border, concurrence by the Canadian government must be obtained for this proposal. As requested, we propose to allot DTV Channel 45 to Hazleton with a power of 546 and a height above average terrain
(HAAT)of 488 meters. DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 21, 2000, and reply comments on or before September 5, 2000. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: David D. Oxenford, JoEllen Masters, Fisher, Wayland, Cooper, Leader & Zaragoza, 2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20006 (Counsel for WOLF License Corporation). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau,
(202)418-1600. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-119, adopted June 26, 2000, and released June 29, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc.,
(202)857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036. Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all *ex parte* contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible *ex parte* contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. Federal Communications Commission. Barbara A. Kreisman, Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 00-17047 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
Connections3 off-index
3 references not yet in our index
  • 47 CFR 73
  • 47 CFR 1.1204(b)
  • 47 CFR 1.415
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule
Cite47 CFR 73
Cite47 CFR 1.1204(b)
Cite47 CFR 1.415
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.