Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-06-19 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Proposed rule; extension of the comment period and correction

478 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/06/19/00-15521·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Proposed rule; extension of the comment period and correction
Citation: 65 FR (No. 118) · FR Doc. 00-15521 · PA4091b;FRL-6719-8 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

In a document published on April 18, 2000 (65 FR 20788), EPA proposed to approve revisions to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP) establishing reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for twenty-six major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NO X ) located in Pennsylvania. EPA specified that comments had to be submitted by May 18, 2000. An individual stated that he required additional time to review the proposal and requested an extension of the comment period. In response, EPA is extending the comment period until July 19, 2000. Also, EPA stated in the notice of proposed rulemaking that details regarding the twenty-six state submittals and EPA's evaluations of them could be found in Technical Support Documents (TSDs). The TSDs provide details regarding twenty-seven submittals. EPA is clarifying that its proposed approval applies to all submittals discussed in the TSDs except that for International Business Systems, Inc. EPA will address Pennsylvania's submittal for International Business Systems, Inc. at a later date.

Dates

Comments must be received on or before July 19, 2000.

Supplementary Information

Administrative Requirements Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and, is therefore not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), or require prior consultation with State officials as specified by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), or involve special consideration of environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). EPA does not believe that it is necessary to subject this action extending the comment period and correcting the proposal to notice-and-comment requirements. Under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute, it is not subject to the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. ). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone. Dated: June 12, 2000. Bradley M. Campbell, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 00-15521 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4
2 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
  • Pub. L. 104-4
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Proposed rule; extension of the comment period and correction
Cite40 CFR 52
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-4
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.