Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2000-06-14 · U.S. International Trade Commission · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

459 words·~2 min read·/register/2000/06/14/00-15007·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: U.S. International Trade Commission
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 00-15007 · Inv. No. 337-TA-414

Summary

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement, and to vacate the final initial determination of the presiding administrative law judge.

Supplementary Information

The Commission ordered the institution of this investigation on September 18, 1998, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Micron Technology, Inc., 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83707-0006 (“complainant”). The notice of investigation was published in the Federal Register on September 25, 1998. 63 FR 51372 (1998). The presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) issued his final initial determination (“ID”) on November 29, 1999, concluding that there was no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. On February 1, 2000, the Commission determined to review the final ID in its entirety. The notice of the Commission decision to review the final ID was published in the Federal Register on February 7, 2000. 65 FR 5890 (2000). On February 15, 2000, respondents, complainant, and the Commission investigation attorney (“IA”) filed written submissions on the issues under review. Responsive submissions were filed on February 22, 2000. On April 4, 2000, complainant Micron and respondents Mosel Vitelic, Inc. and Mosel Vitelic Corp. (collectively “Mosel”) filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation by settlement and vacate the ID. The IA filed a response to the joint motion on April 14, 2000. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in sections 210.20 and 210.50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.20 and 210.50). Copies of the public versions of all documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Issued: June 9, 2000. By order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00-15007 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.